Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorWang, Pin
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yuanjing
dc.contributor.authorWang, Mingqi
dc.contributor.authorSong, Lin
dc.contributor.authorDong, Yi
dc.contributor.authorHan, Xiaolei
dc.contributor.authorTuomilehto, Jaakko 
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yongxiang
dc.contributor.authorDu, Yifeng
dc.contributor.authorQiu, Chengxuan
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-22T13:44:38Z
dc.date.available2024-03-22T13:44:38Z
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0296694.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/19066
dc.descriptionThe protocol of MIND-China was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn; registration no.: ChiCTR1800017758).es_ES
dc.description.abstractBackground: We sought to identify the optimal cut-off of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for defining diabetes and to assess the agreements of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting serum glucose (FSG), and HbA1c in defining diabetes among rural older adults in China. Methods: This population-based cross-sectional study included 3547 participants (age ≥61 years, 57.8% women) from the Multidomain Interventions to Delay Dementia and Disability in Rural China from 2018-2019; of these, 3122 had no previously diagnosed diabetes. We identified the optimal cut-off of HbA1c against FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L for defining diabetes by using receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index. The agreements of FPG, FSG, and HbA1c in defining diabetes were assessed using kappa statistics. Results: Among participants without previously diagnosed diabetes (n = 3122), the optimal HbA1c cut-off for defining diabetes was 6.5% (48 mmol/mol), with the sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 93.7%, and Youden index of 0.825. The correlation coefficients were 0.845 between FPG and FSG, 0.574 between FPG and HbA1c, and 0.529 between FSG and HbA1c in the total sample (n = 3547). The kappa statistic for defining diabetes was 0.962 between FSG and FPG, and 0.812 between HbA1c and FPG. Conclusions: The optimal cut-off of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes against FPG >7.0 mmol/L is ≥6.5% in Chinese rural-dwelling older adults. The agreement in defining diabetes using FPG, FSG, and HbA1c is nearly perfect. These results have relevant implications for diabetes research and clinical practice among older adults in China. Clinical trial registration: The protocol of MIND-China was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn; registration no.: ChiCTR1800017758).es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipY Du was supported by the major grant from the National Key R&D Program of the Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China (Grant No.: 2017YFC1310100) and by additional grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grants No.: 81861138008 and 82011530139), the Academic Promotion Program of Shandong First Medical University (2019QL020), and the Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province, China (Tsqn201909182). C Qiu received grants from the Swedish Research Council (Grants No.: 2017-05819 and 2020-01574), the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT) (Grant No.: CH2019-8320) for the Joint China-Sweden Mobility program, and the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. The funding agency had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the writing of this manuscript, and in the decision to submit the work for publication.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLOS) es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshBlood Glucose es_ES
dc.subject.meshDiabetes Mellitus es_ES
dc.subject.meshHumans es_ES
dc.subject.meshFemale es_ES
dc.subject.meshAged es_ES
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged es_ES
dc.subject.meshMale es_ES
dc.subject.meshGlycated Hemoglobines_ES
dc.subject.meshCross-Sectional Studies es_ES
dc.subject.meshFasting es_ES
dc.subject.meshChina es_ES
dc.titleComparing glycemic traits in defining diabetes among rural Chinese older adultses_ES
dc.typeresearch articlees_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID38271374es_ES
dc.format.volume19es_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.pagee0296694es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0296694es_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinistry of Science and Technology (China) es_ES
dc.contributor.funderNational Natural Science Foundation of China es_ES
dc.contributor.funderShandong First Medical University (China)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderSwedish Research Council es_ES
dc.contributor.funderSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Educationes_ES
dc.contributor.funderKarolinska Institutet es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1932-6203es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296694es_ES
dc.identifier.journalPloS onees_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Escuela Nacional de Sanidades_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Este Item está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons: Atribución 4.0 Internacional