Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCatala-Lopez, Ferran 
dc.contributor.authorAleixandre-Benavent, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorCaulley, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorHutton, Brian
dc.contributor.authorTabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMoher, David
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Arroyo, Adolfo
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T07:58:19Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T07:58:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-07
dc.identifier.citationTrials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):34.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/8911
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide the most reliable information to inform clinical practice and patient care. We aimed to map global clinical research publication activity through RCT-related articles in high-impact-factor medical journals over the past five decades. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of articles published in the highest ranked medical journals with an impact factor > 10 (according to Journal Citation Reports published in 2017). We searched PubMed/MEDLINE (from inception to December 31, 2017) for all RCT-related articles (e.g. primary RCTs, secondary analyses and methodology papers) published in high-impact-factor medical journals. For each included article, raw metadata were abstracted from the Web of Science. A process of standardization was conducted to unify the different terms and grammatical variants and to remove typographical, transcription and/or indexing errors. Descriptive analyses were conducted (including the number of articles, citations, most prolific authors, countries, journals, funding sources and keywords). Network analyses of collaborations between countries and co-words are presented. RESULTS: We included 39,305 articles (for the period 1965-2017) published in forty journals. The Lancet (n = 3593; 9.1%), the Journal of Clinical Oncology (n = 3343; 8.5%) and The New England Journal of Medicine (n = 3275 articles; 8.3%) published the largest number of RCTs. A total of 154 countries were involved in the production of articles. The global productivity ranking was led by the United States (n = 18,393 articles), followed by the United Kingdom (n = 8028 articles), Canada (n = 4548 articles) and Germany (n = 4415 articles). Seventeen authors who had published 100 or more articles were identified; the most prolific authors were affiliated with Duke University (United States), Harvard University (United States) and McMaster University (Canada). The main funding institutions were the National Institutes of Health (United States), Hoffmann-La Roche (Switzerland), Pfizer (United States), Merck Sharp & Dohme (United States) and Novartis (Switzerland). The 100 most cited RCTs were published in nine journals, led by The New England Journal of Medicine (n = 78 articles), The Lancet (n = 9 articles) and JAMA (n = 7 articles). These landmark contributions focused on novel methodological approaches (e.g. the "Bland-Altman method") and trials on the management of chronic conditions (e.g. diabetes control, hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women, multiple therapies for diverse cancers, cardiovascular therapies such as lipid-lowering statins, antihypertensive medications, and antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis identified authors, countries, funding institutions, landmark contributions and high-impact-factor medical journals publishing RCTs. Over the last 50 years, publication production in leading medical journals has increased, with Western countries leading in research but with low- and middle-income countries showing very limited representation.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFC-L and RT-S are supported by the Institute of Health Carlos III/CIBERSAM. BH is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network. DM is supported by a University Research Chair, University of Ottawa. The funders were not involved in the design of the study or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication nor were they involved in aspects of the study conduct. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and may not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of, or as reflecting the position of, the funder(s) or any institution.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC) es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicinees_ES
dc.subjectRandomized controlled triales_ES
dc.subjectScientific collaborationes_ES
dc.titleGlobal mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID31910857es_ES
dc.format.volume21es_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page34es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-019-3944-9es_ES
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III 
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1745-6215es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3944-9es_ES
dc.identifier.journalTrialses_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Escuela Nacional de Sanidades_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Files in this item

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This item is licensed under a: Atribución 4.0 Internacional