Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBerzosa, Pedro 
dc.contributor.authorLucio, Aida de 
dc.contributor.authorRomay-Barja, Maria 
dc.contributor.authorHerrador, Zaida 
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Mora, Vicenta 
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Luz 
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Martinez, Amalia 
dc.contributor.authorSantana-Morales, Maria
dc.contributor.authorNcogo, Policarpo
dc.contributor.authorValladares, Basilio
dc.contributor.authorRiloha, Matilde
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Agustin 
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-21T07:55:21Z
dc.date.available2019-05-21T07:55:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-17
dc.identifier.citationMalar J. 2018 Sep 17;17(1):333.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1475-2875es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/7617
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Malaria in Equatorial Guinea remains a major public health problem. The country is a holo-endemic area with a year-round transmission pattern. In 2016, the prevalence of malaria was 12.09% and malaria caused 15% of deaths among children under 5 years. In the Continental Region, 95.2% of malaria infections were Plasmodium falciparum, 9.5% Plasmodium vivax, and eight cases mixed infection in 2011. The main strategy for malaria control is quick and accurate diagnosis followed by effective treatment. Early and accurate diagnosis of malaria is essential for both effective disease management and malaria surveillance. The quality of malaria diagnosis is important in all settings, as misdiagnosis can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Microscopy and RDTs are the primary choices for diagnosing malaria in the field. However, false-negative results may delay treatment and increase the number of persons capable of infecting mosquitoes in the community. The present study analysed the performance of microscopy and RDTs, the two main techniques used in Equatorial Guinea for the diagnosis of malaria, compared to semi-nested multiplex PCR (SnM-PCR). RESULTS: A total of 1724 samples tested by microscopy, RDT, and SnM-PCR were analysed. Among the negative samples detected by microscopy, 335 (19.4%) were false negatives. On the other hand, the negative samples detected by RDT, 128 (13.3%) were false negatives based on PCR. This finding is important, especially since it is a group of patients who did not receive antimalarial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the high number of false negatives in microscopy, it is necessary to reinforce training in microscopy, the "Gold Standard" in endemic areas. A network of reference centres could potentially support ongoing diagnostic and control efforts made by malaria control programmes in the long term, as the National Centre of Tropical Medicine currently supports the National Programme against Malaria of Equatorial Guinea to perform all of the molecular studies necessary for disease control. Taking into account the results obtained with the RDTs, an exhaustive study of the deletion of the hrp2 gene must be done in EG to help choose the correct RDT for this area.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study (Project Reference PI14CIII/00064-TRPY 1282/15) was funded by the Institute of Health Carlos III, the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID) and the Network Biomedical Research on Tropical Diseases (RICET in Spanish): RD12/0018/0001.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC) es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectDiagnosises_ES
dc.subjectMalariaes_ES
dc.subjectMicroscopyes_ES
dc.subjectRDTses_ES
dc.subjectSnM-PCRes_ES
dc.subject.meshAdolescent es_ES
dc.subject.meshAdult es_ES
dc.subject.meshAged es_ES
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over es_ES
dc.subject.meshAnimals es_ES
dc.subject.meshChild es_ES
dc.subject.meshChild, Preschool es_ES
dc.subject.meshChromatography, Affinity es_ES
dc.subject.meshCross-Sectional Studies es_ES
dc.subject.meshDiagnostic Tests, Routinees_ES
dc.subject.meshEquatorial Guinea es_ES
dc.subject.meshFemale es_ES
dc.subject.meshHumans es_ES
dc.subject.meshInfant es_ES
dc.subject.meshInfant, Newborn es_ES
dc.subject.meshMalaria, Falciparum es_ES
dc.subject.meshMalaria, Vivax es_ES
dc.subject.meshMale es_ES
dc.subject.meshMicroscopy es_ES
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged es_ES
dc.subject.meshPolymerase Chain Reaction es_ES
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult es_ES
dc.titleComparison of three diagnostic methods (microscopy, RDT, and PCR) for the detection of malaria parasites in representative samples from Equatorial Guineaes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID30223852es_ES
dc.format.volume17es_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page333es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12936-018-2481-4es_ES
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III 
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo 
dc.contributor.funderRETICS-Investigación colaborativa en Enfermedades Tropicales (RICET-ISCIII) (España) 
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1475-2875es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2481-4es_ES
dc.identifier.journalMalaria journales_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Medicina Tropicales_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PI14CIII/00064-TRPY1282/15es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/RD12/0018/0001es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Este Item está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons: Atribución 4.0 Internacional