Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVives-Cases, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGoicolea, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Alison
dc.contributor.authorSanz-Barbero, Belén 
dc.contributor.authorGill, Aisha K
dc.contributor.authorBaldry, Anna Costanza
dc.contributor.authorSchröttle, Monika
dc.contributor.authorStöckl, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorStoeckl, Heidi
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-08T17:12:34Z
dc.date.available2018-10-08T17:12:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148364.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/6470
dc.description.abstractFemicide, defined as the killings of females by males because they are females, is becoming recognized worldwide as an important ongoing manifestation of gender inequality. Despite its high prevalence or widespread prevalence, only a few countries have specific registries about this issue. This study aims to assemble expert opinion regarding the strategies which might feasibly be employed to promote, develop and implement an integrated and differentiated femicide data collection system in Europe at both the national and international levels. Concept mapping methodology was followed, involving 28 experts from 16 countries in generating strategies, sorting and rating them with respect to relevance and feasibility. The experts involved were all members of the EU-Cost-Action on femicide, which is a scientific network of experts on femicide and violence against women across Europe. As a result, a conceptual map emerged, consisting of 69 strategies organized in 10 clusters, which fit into two domains: "Political action" and "Technical steps". There was consensus among participants regarding the high relevance of strategies to institutionalize national databases and raise public awareness through different stakeholders, while strategies to promote media involvement were identified as the most feasible. Differences in perceived priorities according to the level of human development index of the experts' countries were also observed.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study received funding from Umeå Center for Global Health Research, funded by FORTE, the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (grant no. 2006-1512). With this funding it was possible to do the data collection and analyses with the appropriate software. The authors didn’t receive any other funding for the study design and preparation of the manuscript.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencees_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshData Collection es_ES
dc.subject.meshEurope es_ES
dc.subject.meshFemale es_ES
dc.subject.meshHomicide es_ES
dc.subject.meshHumans es_ES
dc.subject.meshMale es_ES
dc.subject.meshSex Factors es_ES
dc.subject.meshExpert Testimony es_ES
dc.titleExpert Opinions on Improving Femicide Data Collection across Europe: A Concept Mapping Studyes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID26859885es_ES
dc.format.volume11es_ES
dc.format.number2es_ES
dc.format.pagee0148364es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0148364es_ES
dc.contributor.funderSwedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1932-6203es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148364es_ES
dc.identifier.journalPloS onees_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Escuela Nacional de Sanidades_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Files in this item

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This item is licensed under a: Atribución 4.0 Internacional