Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTerán-Hernández, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorRamis, Rebeca 
dc.contributor.authorCalderón-Hernández, Jaqueline
dc.contributor.authorGarrocho-Rangel, Carlos Félix
dc.contributor.authorCampos-Alanís, Juan
dc.contributor.authorÁvalos-Lozano, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorAguilar-Robledo, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-04T16:31:45Z
dc.date.available2017-09-04T16:31:45Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-29
dc.identifier.citationInt J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/4833
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Worldwide, Cervical Cancer (CC) is the fourth most common type of cancer and cause of death in women. It is a significant public health problem, especially in low and middle-income/Gross Domestic Product (GDP) countries. In the past decade, several studies of CC have been published, that identify the main modifiable and non-modifiable CC risk factors for Mexican women. However, there are no studies that attempt to explain the residual spatial variation in CC incidence In Mexico, i.e. spatial variation that cannot be ascribed to known, spatially varying risk factors. METHODS: This paper uses a spatial statistical methodology that takes into account spatial variation in socio-economic factors and accessibility to health services, whilst allowing for residual, unexplained spatial variation in risk. To describe residual spatial variations in CC risk, we used generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) with both spatially structured and unstructured random effects, using a Bayesian approach to inference. RESULTS: The highest risk is concentrated in the southeast, where the Matlapa and Aquismón municipalities register excessive risk, with posterior probabilities greater than 0.8. The lack of coverage of Cervical Cancer-Screening Programme (CCSP) (RR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.12-1.22), Marginalisation Index (RR 1.05, 95 % CI 1.03-1.08), and lack of accessibility to health services (RR 1.01, 95 % CI 1.00-1.03) were significant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial differences between municipalities, with high-risk areas mainly in low-resource areas lacking accessibility to health services for CC. Our results clearly indicate the presence of spatial patterns, and the relevance of the spatial analysis for public health intervention. Ignoring the spatial variability means to continue a public policy that does not tackle deficiencies in its national CCSP and to keep disadvantaging and disempowering Mexican women in regard to their health care.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC) 
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSpatial analysis
dc.subjectBayesian approach
dc.subjectCervical cancer
dc.subjectGeneralised lineal mixed models
dc.subjectSan Luis Potosí
dc.subjectMéxico
dc.titleGeographic variations in cervical cancer risk in San Luis Potosí state, Mexico: A spatial statistical approach
dc.typejournal article
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID27681081
dc.format.volume15
dc.format.number1
dc.format.page161
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12939-016-0448-z
dc.description.peerreviewed
dc.identifier.e-issn1475-9276
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0448-z
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal for Equity in Health
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Epidemiología
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIII
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Este Item está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons: Atribución 4.0 Internacional