Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSabater, Sebastia
dc.contributor.authorAndres, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Honrubia, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorBerenguer, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorSevillano, Marimar
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Jiménez, Esther
dc.contributor.authorRovirosa, Angeles
dc.contributor.authorArenas, Meritxell
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T09:10:50Z
dc.date.available2024-07-11T09:10:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationSabater S, Andres I, Lopez-Honrubia V, Berenguer R, Sevillano M, Jimenez-Jimenez E, et al. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy in endometrial cancer - a technically easy treatment?. Cancer Manag Res. 2017;9:351-62.en
dc.identifier.issn1179-1322
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/17174
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/20473
dc.description.abstractEndometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological cancers among women in the developed countries. Vaginal cuff is the main location of relapses after a curative surgical procedure and postoperative radiation therapy have proven to diminish it. Nevertheless, these results have not translated into better survival results. The preeminent place of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) in the postoperative treatment of high-to intermediate-risk EC was given by the PORTEC-2 trial, which demonstrated a similar reduction in relapses with VCB than with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), but VCB induced less late toxicity. As a result of this trial, the use of VCB has increased in clinical practice at the expense of EBRT. A majority of the clinical reviews of VCB usually address the risk categories and patient selection but pay little attention to technical aspects of the VCB procedure. Our review aimed to address both aspects. First of all, we described the risk groups, which guide patient selection for VCB in clinical practice. Then, we depicted several technical aspects that might influence dose deposition and toxicity. Bladder distension and rectal distension as well as applicator position or patient position are some of those variables that we reviewed.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherDove Medical Press en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/*
dc.subjectEndometrial cancer
dc.subjectVaginal cuff brachytherapy
dc.subjectRectum
dc.subjectBladder
dc.subjectTechnique
dc.titleVaginal cuff brachytherapy in endometrial cancer - a technically easy treatment?en
dc.typereview articleen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported*
dc.identifier.pubmedID28848362es_ES
dc.format.volume9es_ES
dc.format.page351-362es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/CMAR.S119125
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S119125en
dc.identifier.journalCancer Management and Researches_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85030254623
dc.identifier.wos407381100001
dc.identifier.puiL618493505


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported
Este Item está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported