Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarcia Recio, Marta
dc.contributor.authorCladera-Serra, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorBento, Leyre
dc.contributor.authorDominguez, Julia
dc.contributor.authorde Gracia, Silvia Ruiz
dc.contributor.authorSartori, Francesca
dc.contributor.authordel Campo Garcia, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorBallester Ruiz, Maria del Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGines, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorBargay Lleonart, Joan
dc.contributor.authorSampol Mayol, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T09:10:33Z
dc.date.available2024-07-11T09:10:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-30
dc.identifier.citationGarcia Recio M, Cladera Serra A, Bento L, Dominguez J, Ruiz De Gracia S, Sartori F, et al. Analysis of the role of intratecal liposomal cytarabine in the prophylaxis and treatment of central nervous system lymphomatosis: The Balearic Lymphoma Group experience. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0179595.en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/9773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/20434
dc.description.abstractCentral nervous system (CNS) lymphomatosis is a fatal complication of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In lymphoblastic or Burkitt lymphoma, without specific CNS prophylaxis the risk of CNS relapse is 20-30%. DLBCL has a lower risk of relapse (around 5%) but several factors increase its incidence. There is no consensus or trials to conclude which is the best CNS prophylaxis. Best results seem to be associated with the use of intravenous (iv) high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) but with a significant toxicity. Other options are the administration of intrathecal (IT) MTX, cytarabine or liposomal cytarabine (ITLC). Our aim is to analyze the experience of the centers of the Balearic Lymphoma Group (BLG) about the toxicity and efficacy of ITLC in the prophylaxis and therapy of CNS lymphomatosis. We retrospectively reviewed cases from 2005 to 2015 (n = 58) treated with ITLC. Our toxicity results were: 33% headache, 20% neurological deficits, 11% nausea, 9% dizziness, 4% vomiting, 4% fever, 2% transient blindness and 2% photophobia. In the prophylactic cohort (n = 26) with a median follow-up of 55 months (17-81) only 3 CNS relapses (11%) were observed (testicular DLBCL, Burkitt and plasmablastic lymphoma, with a cumulative incidence of 8%, 14% and 20% respectively). In the treatment cohort (n = 32), CSF complete clearance was obtained in 77% cases. Median OS was 6 months (0-16). Death causes were lymphoma progression (19 patients, 79%), treatment toxicity (2 patients) and nonrelated (3 patients, 12%). Toxicity profile was good especially when concomitant dexamethasone was administered. In the prophylactic cohort the incidence of CNS relapse in DLBCL group was similar to previously reported for HDMTX and much better than IT MTX. A high number of ITLC injections was associated with better rates of CSF clearance, clinical responses, PFS and lower relapses. Survival is still poor in CNS lymphomatosis and new therapeutic approaches are still needed.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLOS) en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshAntimetabolites, Antineoplastic *
dc.subject.meshChild *
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over *
dc.subject.meshAged *
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult *
dc.subject.meshAdult *
dc.subject.meshHumans *
dc.subject.meshAdolescent *
dc.subject.meshCytarabine *
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged *
dc.subject.meshInjections, Spinal *
dc.subject.meshBurkitt Lymphoma *
dc.subject.meshMale *
dc.subject.meshFemale *
dc.subject.meshLiposomes *
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysis *
dc.subject.meshCentral Nervous System Neoplasms *
dc.titleAnalysis of the role of intratecal liposomal cytarabine in the prophylaxis and treatment of central nervous system lymphomatosis: The Balearic Lymphoma Group experienceen
dc.typeresearch articleen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.pubmedID28665999es_ES
dc.format.volume12es_ES
dc.format.number6es_ES
dc.format.pagee0179595es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0179595
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179595en
dc.identifier.journalPloS Onees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.subject.decsLiposomas*
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central*
dc.subject.decsAnálisis de Supervivencia*
dc.subject.decsFemenino*
dc.subject.decsInyecciones Espinales*
dc.subject.decsLinfoma de Burkitt*
dc.subject.decsAdolescente*
dc.subject.decsMasculino*
dc.subject.decsCitarabina*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsPersona de Mediana Edad*
dc.subject.decsAdulto Joven*
dc.subject.decsAnciano*
dc.subject.decsAnciano de 80 o más Años*
dc.subject.decsNiño*
dc.subject.decsAntimetabolitos Antineoplásicos*
dc.subject.decsAdulto*
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021656260
dc.identifier.wos404608700036
dc.identifier.puiL617025212


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
This item is licensed under a: Attribution 4.0 International