Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGrasselli, J
dc.contributor.authorElez, Elena
dc.contributor.authorCaratu, G
dc.contributor.authorMatito, J
dc.contributor.authorSantos, C
dc.contributor.authorMacarulla, T
dc.contributor.authorVidal, J
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, M
dc.contributor.authorVieitez, J. M
dc.contributor.authorPaez, D
dc.contributor.authorFalcó, Esther
dc.contributor.authorLopez Lopez, C
dc.contributor.authorAranda, E
dc.contributor.authorJones, F
dc.contributor.authorSikri, V
dc.contributor.authorNuciforo, P
dc.contributor.authorFasani, Roberta
dc.contributor.authorTabernero, J
dc.contributor.authorMontagut, C
dc.contributor.authorAzuara, D
dc.contributor.authorDienstmann, R
dc.contributor.authorSalazar, R
dc.contributor.authorVivancos, A
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T09:10:32Z
dc.date.available2024-07-11T09:10:32Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.citationGrasselli J, Elez E, Caratu G, Matito J, Santos C, Macarulla T, et al. Concordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun;28(6):1294-301.en
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/9802
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/20432
dc.description.abstractBackground: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential source for tumor genome analysis. We explored the concordance between the mutational status of RAS in tumor tissue and ctDNA in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients to establish eligibility for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Patients and methods: A prospective-retrospective cohort study was carried out. Tumor tissue from 146 mCRC patients was tested for RAS status with standard of care (SoC) PCR techniques, and Digital PCR (BEAMing) was used both in plasma and tumor tissue. Results: ctDNA BEAMing RAS testing showed 89.7% agreement with SoC (Kappa index 0.80; 95% CI 0.71 - 0.90) and BEAMing in tissue showed 90.9% agreement with SoC (Kappa index 0.83; 95% CI 0.74 - 0.92). Fifteen cases (10.3%) showed discordant tissue-plasma results. ctDNA analysis identified nine cases of low frequency RAS mutations that were not detected in tissue, possibly due to technical sensitivity or heterogeneity. In six cases, RAS mutations were not detected in plasma, potentially explained by low tumor burden or ctDNA shedding. Prediction of treatment benefit in patients receiving anti-EGFR plus irinotecan in second- or third-line was equivalent if tested with SoC PCR and ctDNA. Forty-eight percent of the patients showed mutant allele fractions in plasma below 1%. Conclusions: Plasma RAS determination showed high overall agreement and captured a mCRC population responsive to anti-EGFR therapy with the same predictive level as SoC tissue testing. The feasibility and practicality of ctDNA analysis may translate into an alternative tool for anti-EGFR treatment selection.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Merck, S.L., Madrid, Spain, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and partially by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) and 'Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), una manera de hacer Europa' grants [FIS PI12-01589 to RS] and RETICC Cancer: Grupo Cancer Digestivo - Instituto de Salud Carlos III. TTD ULTRA study (EC11-050) was supported by the Ministerio de Sanidad y Politica Social [SPI/2885/2011]. To CM grants [PI15/00457 and DTS15/00048].es_ES
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherOxford University Press en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectanti-EGFR therapy
dc.subjectCirculating tumor DNA
dc.subjectMetastatic colorectal cancer
dc.subjectRAS analysis
dc.subject.meshMutation *
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Metastasis *
dc.subject.meshColorectal Neoplasms *
dc.subject.meshHumans *
dc.subject.meshErbB Receptors *
dc.subject.meshGenes, ras *
dc.titleConcordance of blood- and tumor-based detection of RAS mutations to guide anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal canceren
dc.typeresearch articleen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.pubmedID28368441es_ES
dc.format.volume28es_ES
dc.format.number6es_ES
dc.format.page1294-1301es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annonc/mdx112
dc.identifier.e-issn1569-8041es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx112en
dc.identifier.journalAnnals of Oncologyes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias Colorrectales*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsMetástasis de la Neoplasia*
dc.subject.decsGenes ras*
dc.subject.decsMutación*
dc.subject.decsReceptores ErbB*
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021127627
dc.identifier.wos402861900017
dc.identifier.puiL616918819


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International
Este Item está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International