Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCabrera Cesar, Eva
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Lopez, Lidia
dc.contributor.authorLara, Estrella
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo-San Juan, M Victoria
dc.contributor.authorParrado Romero, Concepcion
dc.contributor.authorPalencia, Jose Luis Royo Sánchez
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Montañez, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Fernandez, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T15:29:39Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T15:29:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-18
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/18252
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18407
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this study is to determine whether Advanced glycosylated end-products (AGE), Advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) and Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7) could be used as differential biomarkers for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). Seventy-three patients were enrolled: 29 with IPF, 14 with CTD-ILD, and 30 healthy controls. The study included a single visit by participants. A blood sample was drawn and serum was analysed for AGE using spectrofluorimetry, AOPP by spectrophotometry, and MMP7 using sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. AGE, AOPP and MMP7 serum levels were significantly higher in both IPF and CTD-ILD patients versus healthy controls; and AGE was also significantly elevated in CTD-ILD compared to the IPF group. AGE plasma levels clearly distinguished CTD-ILD patients from healthy participants (AUC = 0.95; 95% IC 0.86-1), whereas in IPF patients, the distinction was moderate (AUC = 0.78; 95% IC 0.60-0.97). In summary, our results provide support for the potential value of serum AGE, AOPP and MMP7 concentrations as diagnostic biomarkers in IPF and CTD-ILD to differentiate between ILD patients and healthy controls. Furthermore, this study provides evidence, for the first time, for the possible use of AGE as a differential diagnostic biomarker to distinguish between IPF and CTD-ILD. The value of these biomarkers as additional tools in a multidisciplinary approach to IPF and CTD-ILD diagnosis needs to be considered and further explored. Multicentre studies are necessary to understand the role of AGE in differential diagnosis.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectIPF
dc.subjectbiomarkers
dc.subjectprogressive pulmonary fibrosis
dc.titleSerum Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.pubmedID34300333es_ES
dc.format.volume10es_ES
dc.format.number14es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm10143167
dc.identifier.journalJournal of clinical medicinees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 International
Este Item está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International