Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCabrera Cesar, Eva
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Lopez, Lidia
dc.contributor.authorLara, Estrella
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo-San Juan, M Victoria
dc.contributor.authorParrado Romero, Concepcion
dc.contributor.authorPalencia, Jose Luis Royo Sánchez
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Montañez, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Fernandez, Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T15:29:39Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T15:29:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-18
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/18252
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18407
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this study is to determine whether Advanced glycosylated end-products (AGE), Advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) and Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7) could be used as differential biomarkers for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). Seventy-three patients were enrolled: 29 with IPF, 14 with CTD-ILD, and 30 healthy controls. The study included a single visit by participants. A blood sample was drawn and serum was analysed for AGE using spectrofluorimetry, AOPP by spectrophotometry, and MMP7 using sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. AGE, AOPP and MMP7 serum levels were significantly higher in both IPF and CTD-ILD patients versus healthy controls; and AGE was also significantly elevated in CTD-ILD compared to the IPF group. AGE plasma levels clearly distinguished CTD-ILD patients from healthy participants (AUC = 0.95; 95% IC 0.86-1), whereas in IPF patients, the distinction was moderate (AUC = 0.78; 95% IC 0.60-0.97). In summary, our results provide support for the potential value of serum AGE, AOPP and MMP7 concentrations as diagnostic biomarkers in IPF and CTD-ILD to differentiate between ILD patients and healthy controls. Furthermore, this study provides evidence, for the first time, for the possible use of AGE as a differential diagnostic biomarker to distinguish between IPF and CTD-ILD. The value of these biomarkers as additional tools in a multidisciplinary approach to IPF and CTD-ILD diagnosis needs to be considered and further explored. Multicentre studies are necessary to understand the role of AGE in differential diagnosis.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectIPF
dc.subjectbiomarkers
dc.subjectprogressive pulmonary fibrosis
dc.titleSerum Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.pubmedID34300333es_ES
dc.format.volume10es_ES
dc.format.number14es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm10143167
dc.identifier.journalJournal of clinical medicinees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
This item is licensed under a: Attribution 4.0 International