Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSandmann, Frank G
dc.contributor.authorvan Leeuwen, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorBernard-Stoecklin, Sibylle
dc.contributor.authorCasado, Itziar
dc.contributor.authorCastilla Catalán, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorDomegan, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorGherasim, Alin Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorHooiveld, Mariëtte
dc.contributor.authorKislaya, Irina
dc.contributor.authorLarrauri, Amparo 
dc.contributor.authorLevy-Bruhl, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Ausenda
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Diogo F P
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Baz, Iván
dc.contributor.authorMazagatos, Clara 
dc.contributor.authorMcMenamin, Jim
dc.contributor.authorMeijer, Adam
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Josephine L K
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Baltazar
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Joan
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Arlene
dc.contributor.authorThorrington, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorPebody, Richard
dc.contributor.authorBaguelin, Marc
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-20T10:29:03Z
dc.date.available2022-05-20T10:29:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-23
dc.identifier.citationVaccine. 2022 Feb 23;40(9):1306-1315.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14434
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Despite seasonal influenza vaccination programmes in most countries targeting individuals aged ≥ 65 (or ≥ 55) years and high risk-groups, significant disease burden remains. We explored the impact and cost-effectiveness of 27 vaccination programmes targeting the elderly and/or children in eight European settings (n = 205.8 million). Methods: We used an age-structured dynamic-transmission model to infer age- and (sub-)type-specific seasonal influenza virus infections calibrated to England, France, Ireland, Navarra, The Netherlands, Portugal, Scotland, and Spain between 2010/11 and 2017/18. The base-case vaccination scenario consisted of non-adjuvanted, non-high dose trivalent vaccines (TV) and no universal paediatric vaccination. We explored i) moving the elderly to "improved" (i.e., adjuvanted or high-dose) trivalent vaccines (iTV) or non-adjuvanted non-high-dose quadrivalent vaccines (QV); ii) adopting mass paediatric vaccination with TV or QV; and iii) combining the elderly and paediatric strategies. We estimated setting-specific costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the healthcare perspective, and discounted QALYs at 3.0%. Results: In the elderly, the estimated numbers of infection per 100,000 population are reduced by a median of 261.5 (range across settings: 154.4, 475.7) when moving the elderly to iTV and by 150.8 (77.6, 262.3) when moving them to QV. Through indirect protection, adopting mass paediatric programmes with 25% uptake achieves similar reductions in the elderly of 233.6 using TV (range: 58.9, 425.6) or 266.5 using QV (65.7, 477.9), with substantial health gains from averted infections across ages. At €35,000/QALY gained, moving the elderly to iTV plus adopting mass paediatric QV programmes provides the highest mean net benefits and probabilities of being cost-effective in all settings and paediatric coverage levels. Conclusion: Given the direct and indirect protection, and depending on the vaccine prices, model results support a combination of having moved the elderly to an improved vaccine and adopting universal paediatric vaccination programmes across the European settings.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was conducted as part of the I-MOVE+ (Integrated Monitoring of Vaccines in Europe) project, which had received a grant from the European Commission Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 634446). MB also thanks the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Modelling Methodology at Imperial College London in partnership with UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) for funding (grant HPRU-2012–10080). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevier es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectEconomic evaluationes_ES
dc.subjectInfluenzaes_ES
dc.subjectMathematical modeles_ES
dc.subjectPolicyes_ES
dc.subjectPublic healthes_ES
dc.subjectVaccinationes_ES
dc.titleHealth and economic impact of seasonal influenza mass vaccination strategies in European settings: A mathematical modelling and cost-effectiveness analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID35109968es_ES
dc.format.volume40es_ES
dc.format.number9es_ES
dc.format.page1306-1315es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.015es_ES
dc.contributor.funderUnión Europea. Comisión Europea. H2020 es_ES
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Research (Reino Unido) es_ES
dc.contributor.funderHealth Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool (Reino Unido)es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1873-2518es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.015es_ES
dc.identifier.journalVaccinees_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Epidemiologíaes_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/634446/EUes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Este Item está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons: Atribución 4.0 Internacional