Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernández-Carnero, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Saborido, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorAchalandabaso Ochoa-Ruiz de Mendoza, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorFerragut-Garcias, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCuenca-Zaldivar, Juan Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorLeal-Quiñones, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCalvo-Lobo, Cesar
dc.contributor.authorGallego-Izquierdo, Tomas
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T09:44:44Z
dc.date.available2022-05-09T09:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier.citationJ Clin Med. 2021 Dec 3;10(23):5699.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14325
dc.description.abstractRehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) technique seems to be a valid and reliable tool for diagnosis and treatment in physiotherapy and has been widely studied in the lumbopelvic region the last three decades. The aims for this utility in clinical settings must be review through a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. A systematic review was designed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines with PROSPERO registration and per review in all phases of the process using COVIDENCE, analysis of risk of bias and meta-analysis using REVMAN, and meta-regression calculation using STATA. Database screening provided 6544 references, out of which 321 reported narrative synthesis, and 21 reported quantitative synthesis, while only 7 of them provided comparable data to meta-analyze the variables pain and muscle thickness. In most cases, the forest plots showed considerable I2 heterogeneity indexes for multifidus muscle thickness (I2 = 95%), low back pain (I2 = 92%) and abdominal pain (I2 = 95%), not important for transversus abdominis muscle thickness (I2 = 22%), significant heterogenity (I2 = 69%) depending on the subgroup and not important internal oblique muscle thickness (I2 = 0%) and external oblique muscle thickness (I2 = 0%). Meta-regression did not provide significant data for the correlations between the variables analyzed and the intervention, age, and BMI (Body Mass Index). This review reveals that RUSI could contribute to a high reliability of the measurements in the lumbopelvic region with validity and reliability for the assessments, as well as showing promising results for diagnosis and intervention assessment in physiotherapy compared to the traditional model, allowing for future lines of research in this area.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) es_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's versiones_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAbdominal walles_ES
dc.subjectLumbar regiones_ES
dc.subjectPelvic floores_ES
dc.subjectReal time ultrasound imaginges_ES
dc.subjectRehabilitative ultrasound imaginges_ES
dc.titleThe Role of Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging Technique in the Lumbopelvic Region as a Diagnosis and Treatment Tool in Physiotherapy: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regressiones_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID34884401es_ES
dc.format.volume10es_ES
dc.format.number23es_ES
dc.format.page5699es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm10235699es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn2077-0383es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235699es_ES
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Clinical Medicinees_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Escuela Nacional de Sanidades_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Files in this item

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail
Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This item is licensed under a: Atribución 4.0 Internacional