Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMondal, Dinesh
dc.contributor.authorBern, Caryn
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Debashis
dc.contributor.authorRashid, Masud
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Ricardo 
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Rajashree
dc.contributor.authorNath, Rupen
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Prakash
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Lloyd A C
dc.contributor.authorAlim, Abdul
dc.contributor.authorBilbe, Graeme
dc.contributor.authorAlvar, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T13:22:25Z
dc.date.available2022-03-25T13:22:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-07
dc.identifier.citationClin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 2;69(2):251-258.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/13826
dc.description.abstractBackground: On the Indian subcontinent, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) incidence is on track to reach elimination goals by 2020 in nearly all endemic districts. Although not included in official targets, previous data suggest post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) patients can act as an infection reservoir. Methods: We conducted xenodiagnosis on 47 PKDL patients and 15 VL patients using laboratory-reared Phlebotomus argentipes. In direct xenodiagnosis, flies were allowed to feed on the patient's skin for 15 minutes. For indirect xenodiagnosis, flies were fed through a membrane on the patient's blood. Five days later, blood-fed flies were dissected and examined by microscopy and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A 3-mm skin snip biopsy (PKDL) or venous blood (VL) was processed by quantitative PCR. Results: Twenty-seven PKDL patients (57.4%) had positive results by direct and/or indirect xenodiagnosis. Direct was significantly more sensitive than indirect xenodiagnosis (55.3% vs 6.4%, P < .0001). Those with positive xenodiagnosis had median skin parasite loads >1 log10 unit higher than those with negative results (2.88 vs 1.66, P < .0001). In a multivariable model, parasite load, nodular lesions, and positive skin microscopy were significantly associated with positive xenodiagnosis. Blood parasite load was the strongest predictor for VL. Compared to VL, nodular PKDL was more likely and macular PKDL less likely to result in positive xenodiagnosis, but neither difference reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Nodular and macular PKDL, and VL, can be infectious to sand flies. Active PKDL case detection and prompt treatment should be instituted and maintained as an integral part of VL control and elimination programs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the World Health Organization Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, Switzerland; the Spanish Foundation for International Cooperation, Health and Social Affairs; and International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh core donors.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherOxford University Press es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPost-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasises_ES
dc.subjectTransmissiones_ES
dc.subjectVisceral leishmaniasises_ES
dc.subjectXenodiagnosises_ES
dc.subject.meshDisease Reservoirs es_ES
dc.subject.meshDisease Transmission, Infectiouses_ES
dc.subject.meshAdult es_ES
dc.subject.meshAnimals es_ES
dc.subject.meshFemale es_ES
dc.subject.meshHumans es_ES
dc.subject.meshInsect Vectors es_ES
dc.subject.meshLeishmania donovani es_ES
dc.subject.meshLeishmaniasis, Cutaneous es_ES
dc.subject.meshLeishmaniasis, Visceral es_ES
dc.subject.meshMale es_ES
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged es_ES
dc.subject.meshPsychodidae es_ES
dc.titleQuantifying the Infectiousness of Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis Toward Sand Flieses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID30357373es_ES
dc.format.volume69es_ES
dc.format.number2es_ES
dc.format.page251-258es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciy891es_ES
dc.contributor.funderAgencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo es_ES
dc.contributor.funderInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (India) es_ES
dc.contributor.funderWorld Health Organization (WHO/OMS) es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1537-6591es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy891es_ES
dc.identifier.journalClinical Infectious Diseases : An official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of Americaes_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Microbiologíaes_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Files in this item

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This item is licensed under a: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional