Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este Item:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/11767
Título
Helpful Criteria When Implementing NGS Panels in Childhood Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Autor(es)
Vega-Garcia, Nerea | Benito, Rocío | Esperanza-Cebollada, Elena | Llop, Marta | Robledo, Cristina ISCIII | Vicente-Garcés, Clara | Alonso, Javier ISCIII | Barragan, Eva | Fernández, Guerau | Hernández-Sánchez, Jesús M | Martín-Izquierdo, Marta | Maynou, Joan | Minguela, Alfredo | Montaño, Adrián | Ortega, Margarita | Torrebadell, Montserrat | Cervera, José | Sánchez, Joaquín | Jiménez-Velasco, Antonio | Riesco, Susana | Hernández-Rivas, Jesús M | Lassaletta, Álvaro | Fernández, José María | Rives, Susana | Dapena, José Luis | Ramírez, Manuel | Camós, Mireia | Spanish Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (SEHOP). Group of Leukemia
Fecha de publicación
2020-11-26
Cita
J Pers Med . 2020 Nov 26;10(4):244.
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo de documento
journal article
Resumen
The development of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has provided useful diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies for individualized management of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) patients. Consequently, NGS is rapidly being established in clinical practice. However, the technology's complexity, bioinformatics analysis, and the different available options difficult a broad consensus between different laboratories in its daily routine introduction. This collaborative study among Spanish centers was aimed to assess the feasibility, pros, and cons of our customized panel and other commercial alternatives of NGS-targeted approaches. The custom panel was tested in three different sequencing centers. We used the same samples to assess other commercial panels (OncomineTM Childhood Cancer Research Assay; Archer®FusionPlex® ALL, and Human Comprehensive Cancer Panel GeneRead Panel v2®). Overall, the panels showed a good performance in different centers and platforms, but each NGS approach presented some issues, as well as pros and cons. Moreover, a previous consensus on the analysis and reporting following international guidelines would be preferable to improve the concordance in results among centers. Our study shows the challenges posed by NGS methodology and the need to consider several aspects of the chosen NGS-targeted approach and reach a consensus before implementing it in daily practice.
Palabras clave
Versión en línea
DOI
Aparece en las colecciones
- Investigación > ISCIII > Instituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Raras (IIER)
- Investigación > IIS > IMIBIC - Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (Andalucía)
- Investigación > IIS > IBSAL - Instituto de Investigación Biómedica de Salamanca (Castilla y León)
- Investigación > IIS > IMIB - Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria Pascual Parrilla (Murcia)