Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Rafael J
dc.contributor.authorTakemoto, Yoshio
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Raphaël P
dc.contributor.authorFilgueiras-Rama, David 
dc.contributor.authorEnnis, Steven R
dc.contributor.authorMironov, Sergey
dc.contributor.authorBhushal, Sandesh
dc.contributor.authorDeo, Makarand
dc.contributor.authorRajamani, Sridharan
dc.contributor.authorBerenfeld, Omer
dc.contributor.authorBelardinelli, Luiz
dc.contributor.authorJalife, Jose 
dc.contributor.authorPandit, Sandeep V
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-06T09:01:18Z
dc.date.available2020-05-06T09:01:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifier.citationCirc Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019; 12(10):e005557es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1941-3149es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/9925
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Ranolazine inhibits Na+ current (INa), but whether it can convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm remains unclear. We investigated antiarrhythmic mechanisms of ranolazine in sheep models of paroxysmal (PxAF) and persistent AF (PsAF). METHODS: PxAF was maintained during acute stretch (N=8), and PsAF was induced by long-term atrial tachypacing (N=9). Isolated, Langendorff-perfused sheep hearts were optically mapped. RESULTS: In PxAF ranolazine (10 μmol/L) reduced dominant frequency from 8.3±0.4 to 6.2±0.5 Hz (P<0.01) before converting to sinus rhythm, decreased singularity point density from 0.070±0.007 to 0.039±0.005 cm-2 s-1 (P<0.001) in left atrial epicardium (LAepi), and prolonged AF cycle length (AFCL); rotor duration, tip trajectory, and variance of AFCL were unaltered. In PsAF, ranolazine reduced dominant frequency (8.3±0.5 to 6.5±0.4 Hz; P<0.01), prolonged AFCL, increased the variance of AFCL, had no effect on singularity point density (0.048±0.011 to 0.042±0.016 cm-2 s-1; P=ns) and failed to convert AF to sinus rhythm. Doubling the ranolazine concentration (20 μmol/L) or supplementing with dofetilide (1 μmol/L) failed to convert PsAF to sinus rhythm. In computer simulations of rotors, reducing INa decreased dominant frequency, increased tip meandering and produced vortex shedding on wave interaction with unexcitable regions. CONCLUSIONS: PxAF and PsAF respond differently to ranolazine. Cardioversion in the former can be attributed partly to decreased dominant frequency and singularity point density, and prolongation of AFCL. In the latter, increased dispersion of AFCL and likely vortex shedding contributes to rotor formation, compensating for any rotor loss, and may underlie the inefficacy of ranolazine to terminate PsAF.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by: grants from the National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01-HL118304 (Dr Berenfeld) and R01-HL122352 (Dr Jalife); the Leducq Foundation (Drs Jalife, Berenfeld, and Pandit); the University of Michigan Health System and Peking University Health Sciences Center Joint Institute for Translational and Clinical Research (Dr Jalife); Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER; Dr Jalife); the JHRS fellowship program from Medtronic Japan, Uehara Memorial Foundation (Dr Takemoto); American Heart Association postdoctoral fellowship (Dr Takemoto); research grants from Gilead Sciences Inc (Drs Jalife and Pandit); and research support and assistance with implantable devices from St Jude Medical and Medtronic Inc (Drs Jalife and Berenfeld).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Heart Association (AHA) es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAntiarrhythmic drugses_ES
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillationes_ES
dc.subjectCatheter ablationes_ES
dc.subjectDofetilidees_ES
dc.subjectDominant frequencyes_ES
dc.subjectRanolazinees_ES
dc.subjectRotorses_ES
dc.titleMechanisms by Which Ranolazine Terminates Paroxysmal but Not Persistent Atrial Fibrillationes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.pubmedID31594392es_ES
dc.format.volume12es_ES
dc.format.number10es_ES
dc.format.pagee005557es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005557es_ES
dc.contributor.funderNIH - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (Estados Unidos) 
dc.contributor.funderFondation Leducq 
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España) 
dc.contributor.funderUnión Europea. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER/ERDF) 
dc.contributor.funderAmerican Heart Association 
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1941-3084es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005557es_ES
dc.identifier.journalCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiologyes_ES
dc.repisalud.orgCNICCNIC::Grupos de investigación::Arritmias Cardíacases_ES
dc.repisalud.orgCNICCNIC::Grupos de investigación::Desarrollo Avanzado sobre Mecanismos y Terapias de las Arritmiases_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionCNICes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Files in this item

Acceso Abierto
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This item is licensed under a: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional