Publication:
Basophil Activation Test Utility as a Diagnostic Tool in LTP Allergy.

dc.contributor.authorCañas, José A
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Sánchez, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorLopera-Doblas, Leticia
dc.contributor.authorPalomares, Francisca
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Ana
dc.contributor.authorBartra, Joan
dc.contributor.authorTorres, María J
dc.contributor.authorGómez, Francisca
dc.contributor.authorMayorga, Cristobalina
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T15:07:09Z
dc.date.available2024-02-27T15:07:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-29
dc.description.abstractPlant-food allergy is an increasing problem, with nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) triggering mild/severe reactions. Pru p 3 is the major sensitizer in LTP food allergy (FA). However, in vivo and in vitro diagnosis is hampered by the need for differentiating between asymptomatic sensitization and allergy with clinical relevance. The basophil activation test (BAT) is an ex vivo method able to identify specific IgE related to the allergic response. Thus, we aimed to establish the value of BAT in a precise diagnosis of LTP-allergic patients. Ninety-two individuals with peach allergy sensitized to LTP, Pru p 3, were finally included, and 40.2% of them had symptoms to peanut (n = 37). In addition, 16 healthy subjects were recruited. BAT was performed with Pru p 3 and Ara h 9 (peanut LTP) at seven ten-fold concentrations, and was evaluated by flow cytometry, measuring the percentage of CD63 (%CD63+) and CD203c (%CD203chigh) cells, basophil allergen threshold sensitivity (CD-Sens), and area under the dose−response curve (AUC). Significant changes in BAT parameters (%CD63+ and %CD203chigh) were found between the controls and patients. However, comparisons for %CD63+, %CD203chigh, AUC, and CD-Sens showed similar levels among patients with different symptoms. An optimal cut-off was established from ROC curves, showing a significant positive percentage of BAT in patients compared to controls and great values of sensitivity (>87.5%) and specificity (>85%). In addition, BAT showed differences in LTP-allergic patients tolerant to peanut using its corresponding LTP, Ara h 9. BAT can be used as a potential diagnostic tool for identifying LTP allergy and for differentiating peanut tolerance, although neither reactivity nor sensitivity can distinguish the severity of the clinical symptoms.
dc.format.number9es_ES
dc.format.volume23es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijms23094979
dc.identifier.e-issn1422-0067es_ES
dc.identifier.journalInternational journal of molecular scienceses_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/21153
dc.identifier.pubmedID35563370es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18630
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPru p 3
dc.subjectbasophil activation test
dc.subjectdiagnosis
dc.subjectflow cytometry
dc.subjectnonspecific lipid transfer proteins
dc.subject.meshAllergens
dc.subject.meshArachis
dc.subject.meshBasophil Degranulation Test
dc.subject.meshBasophils
dc.subject.meshFood Hypersensitivity
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshImmunoglobulin E
dc.titleBasophil Activation Test Utility as a Diagnostic Tool in LTP Allergy.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files