Publication:
Assessment of quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction management in 28 countries and use of composite quality indicators for benchmarking

dc.contributor.authorRosselló, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorPocock, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorVan de Werf, Frans
dc.contributor.authorChin, Chee Tang
dc.contributor.authorDanchin, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorLee, Stephen W-L
dc.contributor.authorHuo, Yong
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Héctor
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T09:15:52Z
dc.date.available2024-09-13T09:15:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.descriptionThis is an postprint (Accepted Manuscript) of an article published by Oxford in European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care on 2020 Dec. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872620911853
dc.description.abstractThe European Society of Cardiology established a set of quality indicators for the management of acute myocardial infarction. Our aim was to evaluate their degree of attainment, prognostic value and potential use for centre benchmarking in a large international cohort. Quality indicators were extracted from the long-tErm follow-uP of antithrombotic management patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients (EPICOR) (555 hospitals, 20 countries in Europe and Latin America, 2010-2011) and EPICOR Asia (218 hospitals, eight countries, 2011-2012) registries, including non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (n=6558) and ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (n=11,559) hospital survivors. The association between implementation rates for each quality indicator and two-year adjusted mortality was evaluated using adjusted Cox models. Composite quality indicators were categorized for benchmarking assessment at different levels. The degree of attainment of the 17 evaluated quality indicators ranged from 13% to 100%. Attainment of most individual quality indicators was associated with two-year survival. A higher compliance with composite quality indicators was associated with lower mortality at centre-, country- and region-level. Moreover, the higher the risk for two-year mortality, the lower the compliance with composite quality indicators. When EPICOR and EPICOR Asia were conducted, the European Society of Cardiology quality indicators would have been attained to a limited extent, suggesting wide room for improvement in the management of acute myocardial infarction patients. After adjustment for confounding, most quality indicators were associated with reduced two-year mortality and their prognostic value should receive further attention. The two composite quality indicators can be used as a tool for benchmarking either at centre-, country- or world region-level.en
dc.format.number8es_ES
dc.format.page911es_ES
dc.format.volume9es_ES
dc.identifier.citationRossello X, Medina J, Pocock S, Van de Werf F, Chin CT, Danchin N, et al. Assessment of quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction management in 28 countries and use of composite quality indicators for benchmarking. Eur Hear Journal Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec 1;9(8):911-22.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2048872620911853
dc.identifier.e-issn2048-8734es_ES
dc.identifier.journalEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular carees_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/20100
dc.identifier.pubmedID32159359es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL2004453250
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087363113
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/23022
dc.identifier.wos524180800001
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2048872620911853en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.decsBenchmarking*
dc.subject.decsIndicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud*
dc.subject.decsFactores de Tiempo*
dc.subject.decsFemenino*
dc.subject.decsInfarto del Miocardio*
dc.subject.decsHospitales*
dc.subject.decsMasculino*
dc.subject.decsEstudios de Seguimiento*
dc.subject.decsFactores de Riesgo*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsPersona de Mediana Edad*
dc.subject.decsEstudios Prospectivos*
dc.subject.decsPronóstico*
dc.subject.decsAnciano*
dc.subject.decsSistema de Registros*
dc.subject.meshAged*
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studies*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged*
dc.subject.meshHospitals*
dc.subject.meshMyocardial Infarction*
dc.subject.meshPrognosis*
dc.subject.meshMale*
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies*
dc.subject.meshTime Factors*
dc.subject.meshFemale*
dc.subject.meshRisk Factors*
dc.subject.meshRegistries*
dc.subject.meshQuality Indicators, Health Care*
dc.subject.meshBenchmarking*
dc.titleAssessment of quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction management in 28 countries and use of composite quality indicators for benchmarkingen
dc.typeresearch articleen
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationee6666ff-4064-47e5-9144-afdcc607733b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryee6666ff-4064-47e5-9144-afdcc607733b
relation.isPublisherOfPublication465a0b1e-d9df-4342-b738-86ffcafc4bcf
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery465a0b1e-d9df-4342-b738-86ffcafc4bcf

Files