Publication: Is the Parkinson Anxiety Scale comparable across raters?
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
2015-04
Authors
Forjaz, Maria João ISCIII 
Ayala, Alba ISCIII
Martínez-Martín, Pablo ISCIII
Dujardin, Kathy
Pontone, Gregory M
Starkstein, Sergio E
Weintraub, Daniel
Leentjens, Albert F G
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Metrics
Export
Abstract
The Parkinson Anxiety Scale is a new scale developed to measure anxiety severity in Parkinson's disease specifically. It consists of three dimensions: persistent anxiety, episodic anxiety, and avoidance behavior. This study aimed to assess the measurement properties of the scale while controlling for the rater (self- vs. clinician-rated) effect. The Parkinson Anxiety Scale was administered to a cross-sectional multicenter international sample of 362 Parkinson's disease patients. Both patients and clinicians rated the patient's anxiety independently. A many-facet Rasch model design was applied to estimate and remove the rater effect. The following measurement properties were assessed: fit to the Rasch model, unidimensionality, reliability, differential item functioning, item local independency, interrater reliability (self or clinician), and scale targeting. In addition, test-retest stability, construct validity, precision, and diagnostic properties of the Parkinson Anxiety Scale were also analyzed. A good fit to the Rasch model was obtained for Parkinson Anxiety Scale dimensions A and B, after the removal of one item and rescoring of the response scale for certain items, whereas dimension C showed marginal fit. Self versus clinician rating differences were of small magnitude, with patients reporting higher anxiety levels than clinicians. The linear measure for Parkinson Anxiety Scale dimensions A and B showed good convergent construct with other anxiety measures and good diagnostic properties. Parkinson Anxiety Scale modified dimensions A and B provide valid and reliable measures of anxiety in Parkinson's disease that are comparable across raters. Further studies are needed with dimension C.
Description
Keywords
DeCS Terms
Bibliographic citation
Mov Disord. 2015 Apr;30(4):545-51.