Publication:
Vitamin D recommendations in clinical guidelines: A systematic review, quality evaluation and analysis of potential predictors.

dc.contributor.authorFraile Navarro, David
dc.contributor.authorLópez García-Franco, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorNiño de Guzmán, Ena
dc.contributor.authorRabassa, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorZamanillo Campos, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorPardo-Hernández, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorRicci-Cabello, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCanelo-Aybar, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMeneses-Echavez, Jose F
dc.contributor.authorYepes-Nuñez, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorKuindersma, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorGich Saladich, Ignasi
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T06:45:05Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T06:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.description.abstractBackground: Vitamin D has been widely promoted for bone health through supplementation and fortification of the general adult population. However, there is growing evidence that does not support these strategies. Our aim is to review the quality and recommendations on vitamin D nutritional and clinical practice guidelines and to explore predictive factors for their direction and strength. Methods: We searched three databases and two guideline repositories from 2010 onwards. We performed a descriptive analysis, a quality appraisal using AGREE II scores (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) and a bivariate analysis evaluating the association between direction and strength of recommendations, AGREE II domains' scores and pre-specified characteristics. Results: We included 34 guidelines, 44.1% recommended, 26.5% suggested and 29.4% did not recommend vitamin D supplementation. Guidelines that scored higher for "editorial independence" and "overall quality score" were less likely to recommend or suggest vitamin D supplementation (median 68.8 vs 35.4; P = .001 and 58.3 vs 37.5; P = .02). Guidance produced by government organisations and those that reported source of funding were associated with higher AGREE II scores. Unclear role of source of funding was associated with recommending or suggesting vitamin D supplementation (P = .034). Editorial independence was an independent predictor for recommending or suggesting vitamin D supplementation (OR 1.09; CI95% 1.02 to 1.16; P = .006). Conclusions: Policymakers, clinicians and patients should be aware that lower quality guidelines and those reporting conflicts of interest are more likely to promote vitamin D supplementation. Guideline organisations should improve the quality of their recommendations' development and the management of conflicts of interest. Users and editors should be aware of these findings when using and appraising guidelines.en
dc.description.sponsorshipPablo Alonso-Coello was supported by a Miguel Servet investigator contract from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CPII15/0034). Montserrat Rabassa is funded by a Sara Borrell post-doctoral contract (CD16/00157) from the Carlos III Institute of Health and the European Social Fund (ESF).es_ES
dc.format.number11es_ES
dc.format.pagee14805es_ES
dc.format.volume75es_ES
dc.identifier.citationFraile Navarro D, López García-Franco A, Niño de Guzmán E, et al. Vitamin D recommendations in clinical guidelines: A systematic review, quality evaluation and analysis of potential predictors. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14805.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijcp.14805
dc.identifier.e-issn1742-1241es_ES
dc.identifier.journalInternational journal of clinical practicees_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/18731
dc.identifier.pubmedID34486779es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL2013710122
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85115064455
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/23352
dc.identifier.wos696111900001
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/CPII15/0034en
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/CD16/00157en
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.20200104610.1111/ijcp.14805en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsBases de Datos Factuales*
dc.subject.decsVitaminas*
dc.subject.decsAdulto*
dc.subject.decsVitamina D*
dc.subject.meshDatabases, Factual*
dc.subject.meshVitamins*
dc.subject.meshAdult*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshVitamin D*
dc.titleVitamin D recommendations in clinical guidelines: A systematic review, quality evaluation and analysis of potential predictors.en
dc.typeresearch articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublicationd81e762a-95f7-4917-88a1-8004b3b8caa7
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd81e762a-95f7-4917-88a1-8004b3b8caa7

Files