Publication:
Outcomes of new quality standards of follitropin alfa on ovarian stimulation: meta-analysis of previous studies

dc.contributor.authorSaz-Parkinson, ZuleiKa
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Cuadrado, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorBouza, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorAmate, Jose Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T09:24:09Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T09:24:09Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractBackground: Human follicle-stimulating hormone (hFSH; follitropin alfa) can be employed therapeutically to induce ovarian follicular development in assisted reproduction treatments. Current recombinant hFSH (r-hFSH) preparations available for clinical use are labeled either in terms of the bioactivity expressed in international units (IU) or in mass (microg). Several clinical trials have tried to assess the clinical implications of the physicochemical improvements in the dosing of follitropin alfa filled by mass (FbM). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of previous studies in order to assess the efficacy and safety of ovarian stimulation using follitropin alfa FbM compared with follitropin alfa filled by international units (FbIU). Methods: A literature search was carried out in scientific databases to find published articles and abstracts comparing both hormone preparations. A fixed effects model meta-analysis was performed. The variables studied include the average dose (IU), days of treatment, estradiol peak, follicles >14 mm, number of extracted oocytes, number of embryos obtained, number of cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancies. Results: A total of six studies met the stated criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. In these studies, the average r-hFSH dose per patient was 230.29 IU less with administration of follitropin alfa FbM compared with FbIU, and the number of days of treatment was reduced by 0.48. In addition, a significantly greater number of oocytes (0.84) were extracted, more embryos (0.88) were obtained, and a higher peak level of estradiol (613.08 pmol/L) was achieved in the patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with follitropin alfa FbM. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the number of follicles >14 mm, clinical pregnancies, or OHSS cases. Conclusion: Follitropin alfa FbM, a technologically modified formulation of r-hFSH, is as safe as follitropin alfa FbIU but requires a smaller dose over a shorter period to produce more oocytes and final embryos.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page37-42es_ES
dc.format.volume23es_ES
dc.identifier.citationBioDrugs. 2009;23(1):37-42.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.2165/00063030-200923010-00004es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1179-190Xes_ES
dc.identifier.journalBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapyes_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID19344190es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/17367
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200923010-00004es_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitariases_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshQuality Indicators, Health Carees_ES
dc.subject.meshChemistry, Pharmaceuticales_ES
dc.subject.meshDrug Administration Schedulees_ES
dc.subject.meshEmbryo Transferes_ES
dc.subject.meshFemalees_ES
dc.subject.meshFertility Agents, Femalees_ES
dc.subject.meshFertilization in Vitroes_ES
dc.subject.meshFollicle Stimulating Hormone, Humanes_ES
dc.subject.meshGlycoprotein Hormones, alpha Subunites_ES
dc.subject.meshHumanses_ES
dc.subject.meshOvulationes_ES
dc.subject.meshOvulation Inductiones_ES
dc.subject.meshQuality Controles_ES
dc.subject.meshRecombinant Proteinses_ES
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomees_ES
dc.titleOutcomes of new quality standards of follitropin alfa on ovarian stimulation: meta-analysis of previous studieses_ES
dc.typereview articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication99dfe2a8-30ac-4e03-acf8-eb088ad2485f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd026ae99-29dc-4341-aa3f-236cf54d8a67
relation.isAuthorOfPublication25d5e1f0-261d-4c71-b02d-f9a3b335d01c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1a315ede-476b-4df9-88b2-d2d54ed749d1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery99dfe2a8-30ac-4e03-acf8-eb088ad2485f

Files