Publication:
Variability in adherence to clinical practice guidelines and recommendations in COPD outpatients: a multi-level, cross-sectional analysis of the EPOCONSUL study.

dc.contributor.authorCalle Rubio, Myriam
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Campos, Jose Luis
dc.contributor.authorSoler-Cataluña, Juan J
dc.contributor.authorAlcázar Navarrete, Bernardino
dc.contributor.authorSoriano, Joan B
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez González-Moro, José Miguel
dc.contributor.authorFuentes Ferrer, Manuel E
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Hermosa, Juan Luis
dc.contributor.authorEPOCONSUL Study
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T09:25:33Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T09:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-02
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical audits have reported considerable variability in COPD medical care and frequent inconsistencies with recommendations. The objectives of this study were to identify factors associated with a better adherence to clinical practice guidelines and to explore determinants of this variability at the the hospital level. Methods: EPOCONSUL is a Spanish nationwide clinical audit that evaluates the outpatient management of COPD. Multilevel logistic regression with two levels was performed to assess the relationships between individual and disease-related factors, as well as hospital characteristics. Results: A total of 4508 clinical records of COPD patients from 59 Spanish hospitals were evaluated. High variability was observed among hospitals in terms of medical care. Some of the patient's characteristics (airflow obstruction, degree of dyspnea, exacerbation risk, presence of comorbidities), the hospital factors (size and respiratory nurses available) and treatment at a specialized COPD outpatient clinic were identified as factors associated with a better adherence to recommendations, although this only explains a small proportion of the total variance. Conclusion: To be treated at a specialized COPD outpatient clinic and some intrinsic patient characteristics were factors associated with a better adherence to guideline recommendations, although these variables were only explaining part of the high variability observed among hospitals in terms of COPD medical care.
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page200es_ES
dc.format.volume18es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12931-017-0685-8
dc.identifier.e-issn1465-993Xes_ES
dc.identifier.journalRespiratory researches_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/11866
dc.identifier.pubmedID29197415es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/25226
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAdherence to recommendations
dc.subjectChronic obstructive pulmonary disease
dc.subjectClinical audit
dc.subjectClinical practice guidelines
dc.subjectMedical care
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAmbulatory Care
dc.subject.meshCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshGuideline Adherence
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMedical Audit
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshOutpatient Clinics, Hospital
dc.subject.meshPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.subject.meshPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
dc.titleVariability in adherence to clinical practice guidelines and recommendations in COPD outpatients: a multi-level, cross-sectional analysis of the EPOCONSUL study.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files