Publication:
Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial.

dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Peral, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorConejo-Cerón, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorLuna, Juan de Dios
dc.contributor.authorKing, Michael
dc.contributor.authorNazareth, Irwin
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Pérez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Alonso, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorBallesta-Rodríguez, María Isabel
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Anna
dc.contributor.authorAiarzaguena, José María
dc.contributor.authorMontón-Franco, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorBellón, Juan Ángel
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T15:24:52Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T15:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-28
dc.description.abstractIn the predictD-intervention, GPs used a personalised biopsychosocial programme to prevent depression. This reduced the incidence of major depression by 21.0%, although the results were not statistically significant. To determine whether the predictD-intervention is effective at preventing anxiety in primary care patients without depression or anxiety. Secondary study of a cluster randomised trial with practices randomly assigned to either the predictD-intervention or usual care. This study was conducted in seven Spanish cities from October 2010 to July 2012. In each city, 10 practices and two GPs per practice, as well as four to six patients every recruiting day, were randomly selected until there were 26-27 eligible patients for each GP. The endpoint was cumulative incidence of anxiety as measured by the PRIME-MD screening tool over 18 months. A total of 3326 patients without depression and 140 GPs from 70 practices consented and were eligible to participate; 328 of these patients were removed because they had an anxiety syndrome at baseline. Of the 2998 valid patients, 2597 (86.6%) were evaluated at the end of the study. At 18 months, 10.4% (95% CI = 8.7% to 12.1%) of the patients in the predictD-intervention group developed anxiety compared with 13.1% (95% CI = 11.4% to 14.8%) in the usual-care group (absolute difference = -2.7% [95% CI = -5.1% to -0.3%]; P = 0.029). A personalised intervention delivered by GPs for the prevention of depression provided a modest but statistically significant reduction in the incidence of anxiety.
dc.format.number703es_ES
dc.format.pagee95-e104es_ES
dc.format.volume71es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp20X714041
dc.identifier.e-issn1478-5242es_ES
dc.identifier.journalThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitionerses_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/17040
dc.identifier.pubmedID33495203es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18242
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectanxiety
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectdepression
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.subjectprimary prevention
dc.subject.meshAnxiety
dc.subject.meshAnxiety Disorders
dc.subject.meshDepression
dc.subject.meshDepressive Disorder, Major
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPrimary Health Care
dc.titleUse of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files