Publication:
Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?

dc.contributor.authorCuartero, Maria Isabel
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Culebras, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Lopez, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorMedina, Violeta
dc.contributor.authorFraga, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorVazquez-Reyes, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorJareño-Flores, Tania
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Segura, Juan M
dc.contributor.authorLizasoain, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorMoro, Maria Angeles
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
dc.contributor.funderFondation Leducq
dc.contributor.funderFundación La Caixa
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.contributor.funderUnión Europea. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER/ERDF)
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Universidades (España)
dc.contributor.funderFundación ProCNIC
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T07:04:49Z
dc.date.available2021-09-15T07:04:49Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-23
dc.description.abstractThe substantial clinical burden and disability after stroke injury urges the need to explore therapeutic solutions. Recent compelling evidence supports that neurogenesis persists in the adult mammalian brain and is amenable to regulation in both physiological and pathological situations. Its ability to generate new neurons implies a potential to contribute to recovery after brain injury. However, post-stroke neurogenic response may have different functional consequences. On the one hand, the capacity of newborn neurons to replenish the damaged tissue may be limited. In addition, aberrant forms of neurogenesis have been identified in several insult settings. All these data suggest that adult neurogenesis is at a crossroads between the physiological and the pathological regulation of the neurological function in the injured central nervous system (CNS). Given the complexity of the CNS together with its interaction with the periphery, we ultimately lack in-depth understanding of the key cell types, cell-cell interactions, and molecular pathways involved in the neurogenic response after brain damage and their positive or otherwise deleterious impact. Here we will review the evidence on the stroke-induced neurogenic response and on its potential repercussions on functional outcome. First, we will briefly describe subventricular zone (SVZ) neurogenesis after stroke beside the main evidence supporting its positive role on functional restoration after stroke. Then, we will focus on hippocampal subgranular zone (SGZ) neurogenesis due to the relevance of hippocampus in cognitive functions; we will outline compelling evidence that supports that, after stroke, SGZ neurogenesis may adopt a maladaptive plasticity response further contributing to the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia. Finally, we will discuss the therapeutic potential of specific steps in the neurogenic cascade that might ameliorate brain malfunctioning and the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment in the chronic phase.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the grants from Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, PID2019-106581RB-I00 (MM); Leducq Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, TNE-19CVD01 (MM); Fundación La Caixa, HR17_00527 (MM); Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund “A Way to Achieve Europe,” PI20/00535 and RETICS RD16/0019/0009 (IL); by contracts FJC-039343-I (AG-C) from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation; and FPU01405265 (VM) and FPU19/02989 (EF) from the Spanish Ministry of Universities. The CNIC is supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN), and the Pro CNIC Foundation and is a Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence (SEV-2015-0505).es_ES
dc.format.page657846es_ES
dc.format.volume9es_ES
dc.identifier.citationFront Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:657846es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fcell.2021.657846es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2296-634Xes_ES
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in cell and developmental biologyes_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID33834025es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/13390
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.projectFECYTinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PID2019-106581RB-I00es_ES
dc.relation.projectFECYTinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/HR17_00527es_ES
dc.relation.projectFECYTinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/FJC-039343-Ies_ES
dc.relation.projectFECYTinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/FPU01405265es_ES
dc.relation.projectFECYTinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/FPU19/02989es_ES
dc.relation.projectFECYTinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/SEV-2015-0505es_ES
dc.relation.projectFECYTinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PI20/00535es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.657846es_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionCNICes_ES
dc.repisalud.orgCNICCNIC::Grupos de investigación::Fisiopatología Neurovasculares_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titlePost-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isFunderOfPublication289dce42-6a28-4892-b0a8-c70c46cbb185
relation.isFunderOfPublicationb6569c41-2f78-421a-a6af-7e900315938d
relation.isFunderOfPublicationf04d23ec-a91d-4242-88b0-cc436888f8a2
relation.isFunderOfPublication7d739953-4b68-4675-b5bb-387a9ab74b66
relation.isFunderOfPublicationefa64f05-b985-4984-8f1e-5fc4ef21f502
relation.isFunderOfPublication11785c68-da51-4a19-8474-d71ce312b3c9
relation.isFunderOfPublicationef935eeb-4c46-446a-868e-66e905683e75
relation.isFunderOfPublication.latestForDiscovery289dce42-6a28-4892-b0a8-c70c46cbb185
relation.isPublisherOfPublication9f9fa5ea-093b-43d8-bf2c-5bd65d08a802
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9f9fa5ea-093b-43d8-bf2c-5bd65d08a802

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PostStrokeNeurogenesisFriend _2021.pdf
Size:
752.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artículo