Publication:
Use of multidimensional item response theory methods for dementia prevalence prediction: an example using the Health and Retirement Survey and the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study

dc.contributor.authorGBD 2019 Dementia Collaborators
dc.contributor.authorCatalá-López, Ferrán
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T11:05:45Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T11:05:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-11
dc.description.abstractBackground: Data sparsity is a major limitation to estimating national and global dementia burden. Surveys with full diagnostic evaluations of dementia prevalence are prohibitively resource-intensive in many settings. However, validation samples from nationally representative surveys allow for the development of algorithms for the prediction of dementia prevalence nationally. Methods: Using cognitive testing data and data on functional limitations from Wave A (2001-2003) of the ADAMS study (n = 744) and the 2000 wave of the HRS study (n = 6358) we estimated a two-dimensional item response theory model to calculate cognition and function scores for all individuals over 70. Based on diagnostic information from the formal clinical adjudication in ADAMS, we fit a logistic regression model for the classification of dementia status using cognition and function scores and applied this algorithm to the full HRS sample to calculate dementia prevalence by age and sex. Results: Our algorithm had a cross-validated predictive accuracy of 88% (86-90), and an area under the curve of 0.97 (0.97-0.98) in ADAMS. Prevalence was higher in females than males and increased over age, with a prevalence of 4% (3-4) in individuals 70-79, 11% (9-12) in individuals 80-89 years old, and 28% (22-35) in those 90 and older. Conclusions: Our model had similar or better accuracy as compared to previously reviewed algorithms for the prediction of dementia prevalence in HRS, while utilizing more flexible methods. These methods could be more easily generalized and utilized to estimate dementia prevalence in other national surveys.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page241es_ES
dc.format.volume21es_ES
dc.identifier.citationBMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):241.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12911-021-01590-yes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1472-6947es_ES
dc.identifier.journalBMC medical informatics and decision makinges_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID34380485es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14998
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01590-yes_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Escuela Nacional de Sanidad (ENS)es_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectDementiaes_ES
dc.subjectPrevalencees_ES
dc.subjectAlgorithmes_ES
dc.subjectValidityes_ES
dc.subjectGlobal healthes_ES
dc.subject.meshDementiaes_ES
dc.subject.meshRetirementes_ES
dc.titleUse of multidimensional item response theory methods for dementia prevalence prediction: an example using the Health and Retirement Survey and the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Studyes_ES
dc.typeresearch articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc2e7abf4-ef1a-414b-8ad5-def093def943
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc2e7abf4-ef1a-414b-8ad5-def093def943
relation.isPublisherOfPublication4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
UseMultidimensionalItemResponse_2021.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: