Publication:
Breast Dense Tissue Segmentation with Noisy Labels: A Hybrid Threshold-Based and Mask-Based Approach

dc.contributor.authorLarroza, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Benito, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Cortes, Juan-Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRomán, Marta
dc.contributor.authorPollan-Santamaria, Marina
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Gomez, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorSalas-Trejo, Dolores
dc.contributor.authorCasals, María
dc.contributor.authorLlobet, Rafael
dc.contributor.funderGeneralitat Valenciana (España)
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.contributor.funderUnión Europea. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER/ERDF)
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T10:48:42Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T10:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-28
dc.description.abstractBreast density assessed from digital mammograms is a known biomarker related to a higher risk of developing breast cancer. Supervised learning algorithms have been implemented to determine this. However, the performance of these algorithms depends on the quality of the ground-truth information, which expert readers usually provide. These expert labels are noisy approximations to the ground truth, as there is both intra- and inter-observer variability among them. Thus, it is crucial to provide a reliable method to measure breast density from mammograms. This paper presents a fully automated method based on deep learning to estimate breast density, including breast detection, pectoral muscle exclusion, and dense tissue segmentation. We propose a novel confusion matrix (CM)-YNet model for the segmentation step. This architecture includes networks to model each radiologist's noisy label and gives the estimated ground-truth segmentation as well as two parameters that allow interaction with a threshold-based labeling tool. A multi-center study involving 1785 women whose "for presentation" mammograms were obtained from 11 different medical facilities was performed. A total of 2496 mammograms were used as the training corpus, and 844 formed the testing corpus. Additionally, we included a totally independent dataset from a different center, composed of 381 women with one image per patient. Each mammogram was labeled independently by two expert radiologists using a threshold-based tool. The implemented CM-Ynet model achieved the highest DICE score averaged over both test datasets (0.82±0.14) when compared to the closest dense-tissue segmentation assessment from both radiologists. The level of concordance between the two radiologists showed a DICE score of 0.76±0.17. An automatic breast density estimator based on deep learning exhibited higher performance when compared with two experienced radiologists. This suggests that modeling each radiologist's label allows for better estimation of the unknown ground-truth segmentation. The advantage of the proposed model is that it also provides the threshold parameters that enable user interaction with a threshold-based tool.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partially funded by Generalitat Valenciana through IVACE (Valencian Institute of Business Competitiveness) distributed by nomination to Valencian technological innovation centres under project expedient IMDEEA/2021/100. It was also supported by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER (PI17/00047).es_ES
dc.format.number8es_ES
dc.format.page1822es_ES
dc.format.volume12es_ES
dc.identifier.citationDiagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;12(8):1822.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics12081822es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418es_ES
dc.identifier.journalDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)es_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID36010173es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/15061
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.projectFISinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PI17/00047es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081822es_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Epidemiología (CNE)es_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectBreast density segmentationes_ES
dc.subjectDeep learninges_ES
dc.subjectMammographyes_ES
dc.subjectNoisy labelses_ES
dc.titleBreast Dense Tissue Segmentation with Noisy Labels: A Hybrid Threshold-Based and Mask-Based Approaches_ES
dc.typeresearch articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcb3b77d8-c78c-4238-9b9d-c1171ff3ab51
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4b7eabf1-df99-4684-9c92-42bc37de6a41
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycb3b77d8-c78c-4238-9b9d-c1171ff3ab51
relation.isFunderOfPublication842e6617-7822-4501-a927-7e8cedda4aa6
relation.isFunderOfPublication7d739953-4b68-4675-b5bb-387a9ab74b66
relation.isFunderOfPublicationefa64f05-b985-4984-8f1e-5fc4ef21f502
relation.isFunderOfPublication.latestForDiscovery842e6617-7822-4501-a927-7e8cedda4aa6
relation.isPublisherOfPublication30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BreastDenseTissueSegmentation_2022.pdf
Size:
5.84 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: