Publication:
A Three-Step Procedure for Emergency Cerclage: Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes.

dc.contributor.authorGómez-Castellano, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorSabonet-Morente, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Mesa, Ernesto
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-López, Jesús S
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T15:15:51Z
dc.date.available2024-02-27T15:15:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-24
dc.description.abstractBackground: The objective of our prospective observational study was to evaluate a new technique for emergency cerclage, which was performed on a cohort of patients with cervical incompetence in the second trimester. Methods: 26 pregnant women presented at 15 to 24 weeks of gestation with cervical dilatation and bursa prolapse. A new emergency cerclage was performed using a technique consisting of the first cerclage in a tobacco bag and a second occlusive cerclage located inferiorly to the first. The technique is concluded with the performance of a cervical cleisis when vaginal bag prolapse is present, and this overall procedure is called the three-step procedure for emergency cerclage (TSEC). Results: To assess its effectiveness, we measured the latency from procedure to delivery, pregnancy duration, infant birth weight, and rate of premature amniorrhexis. The mean latency from procedure to delivery was 14 weeks + 6 days, the mean weight of newborns was 2550 g and the mean gestational age at delivery was 35 weeks. The neonatal survival rate was 95.8%. The rate of premature amniorrhexis (<34 weeks gestational age) was 8.3% (two cases) with successful perinatal outcomes. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups. A multivariate regression model showed that the best variables for predicting the latency to delivery were the cervical dilatation at diagnosis, use of the three-step cerclage, cervical length after the procedure, and gestational age at diagnosis. Conclusions: The excellent results obtained with the TSEC procedure in terms of the latency from the procedure to delivery, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and having few reported complications highlight the importance of collecting new data on this promising novel procedure.
dc.format.number5es_ES
dc.format.volume19es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph19052636
dc.identifier.e-issn1660-4601es_ES
dc.identifier.journalInternational journal of environmental research and public healthes_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/21036
dc.identifier.pubmedID35270320es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18766
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectcervical incompetence
dc.subjectemergency cerclage
dc.subjectpreterm birth
dc.subject.meshBirth Weight
dc.subject.meshCerclage, Cervical
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshGestational Age
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshInfant, Newborn
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.subject.meshPregnancy Outcome
dc.subject.meshPremature Birth
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studies
dc.titleA Three-Step Procedure for Emergency Cerclage: Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files