Publication:
Healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review

dc.contributor.authorNiño de Guzman, Ena
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yang
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorCanelo-Aybar, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorNeamtiu, Luciana
dc.contributor.authorParmelli, Elena
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Bracchiglione, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRabassa, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorRigau, David
dc.contributor.authorParkinson, Zuleika Saz
dc.contributor.authorSola, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorVasquez-Mejia, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorRicci-Cabello, Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T09:15:58Z
dc.date.available2024-09-13T09:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Clinical guidelines' (CGs) adherence supports high-quality care. However, healthcare providers do not always comply with CGs recommendations. This systematic literature review aims to assess the extent of healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe and to identify the factors that impact on healthcare providers' adherence. Methods: We searched for systematic reviews and quantitative or qualitative primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase up to May 2019. The eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and cross-checked by a second author. We conducted a narrative synthesis attending to the modality of the healthcare process, methods to measure adherence, the scope of the CGs, and population characteristics. Results: Out of 8137 references, we included 41 primary studies conducted in eight European countries. Most followed a retrospective cohort design (19/41; 46%) and were at low or moderate risk of bias. Adherence for overall breast cancer care process (from diagnosis to follow-up) ranged from 54 to 69%; for overall treatment process [including surgery, chemotherapy (CT), endocrine therapy (ET), and radiotherapy (RT)] the median adherence was 57.5% (interquartile range (IQR) 38.8-67.3%), while for systemic therapy (CT and ET) it was 76% (IQR 68-77%). The median adherence for the processes assessed individually was higher, ranging from 74% (IQR 10-80%), for the follow-up, to 90% (IQR 87-92.5%) for ET. Internal factors that potentially impact on healthcare providers' adherence were their perceptions, preferences, lack of knowledge, or intentional decisions. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of breast cancer patients are not receiving CGs-recommended care. Healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer CGs in Europe has room for improvement in almost all care processes. CGs development and implementation processes should address the main factors that influence healthcare providers' adherence, especially patient-related ones. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018092884).en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe systematic review was carried out by the Iberoamerican Cochrane Center under Framework Contract 443094 for procurement of services between European Commission Joint Research Centre and Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana. YS is funded by China Scholarship Council (No. 201707040103). MR is funded by Sara Borrell contract (CD16/00157). AVM received a training Grant D43 TW007393 Fogarty International Centre of the US National Institutes of Health for the Emerging Diseases and Climate Change Research Unit of the School and Public Health Administration at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.es_ES
dc.format.number3es_ES
dc.format.page499-518es_ES
dc.format.volume181es_ES
dc.identifier.citationNiño de Guzman E, Song Y, Alonso-Coello P, Canelo-Aybar C, Neamtiu L, Parmelli E, et al. Healthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):499-518. Epub 2020 May 6.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10549-020-05657-8
dc.identifier.e-issn1573-7217es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0167-6806
dc.identifier.journalBreast Cancer Research and Treatmentes_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/10698
dc.identifier.pubmedID32378052es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL2004857375
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084677143
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/23037
dc.identifier.wos531334100002
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05657-8en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectBreast neoplasms
dc.subjectGuidelines as topic
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicine
dc.subjectGuideline adherence
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subject.decsAtención a la Salud*
dc.subject.decsGuías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsCalidad de la Atención de Salud*
dc.subject.decsFemenino*
dc.subject.decsPersonal de Salud*
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias de la Mama*
dc.subject.decsAdhesión a Directriz*
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasms*
dc.subject.meshQuality of Health Care*
dc.subject.meshHealth Personnel*
dc.subject.meshFemale*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshGuideline Adherence*
dc.subject.meshPractice Guidelines as Topic*
dc.subject.meshDelivery of Health Care*
dc.titleHealthcare providers' adherence to breast cancer guidelines in Europe: a systematic literature reviewen
dc.typereview articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublication8d558850-2ef2-4d1e-b0e1-4e5591ab6288
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8d558850-2ef2-4d1e-b0e1-4e5591ab6288

Files