Publication:
A multinational observational study identifying primary care patients at risk of overestimation of asthma control

dc.contributor.authorKritikos, Vicky
dc.contributor.authorPrice, David
dc.contributor.authorPapi, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorInfantino, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorStallberg, Bjorn
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Dermot
dc.contributor.authorLavorini, Federico
dc.contributor.authorChrystyn, Henry
dc.contributor.authorHaughney, John
dc.contributor.authorLisspers, Karin
dc.contributor.authorGruffydd-Jones, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorRoman-Rodriguez, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorHenrichsen, Svein Hoegh
dc.contributor.authorvan der Molen, Thys
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorBosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-10T13:09:49Z
dc.date.available2024-09-10T13:09:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-05
dc.description.abstractFactors related to the discrepancy between patient-perceived and actual disease control remain unclear. Identifying patients at risk of overestimation of asthma control remains elusive. This study aimed to (i) investigate the relationship between patient-reported and actual level of asthma control (ii), compare the characteristics between patients who believe their asthma is well controlled that accurately report 'well-controlled' asthma with those that do not, and (iii) identify factors associated with inaccurately reported 'well-controlled' asthma. A historical, multinational, cross-sectional study using data from the iHARP (initiative Helping Asthma in Real-life Patients) review service for adults with asthma prescribed fixed-dose combination therapy. Data from 4274 patients were analysed. A major discrepancy between patient-reported and Global Initiative for Asthma defined asthma control was detected; 71.1% of patients who reported 'well-controlled' asthma were inaccurate in their perception despite receiving regular maintenance therapy. Significant differences were noted in age, gender, body mass index, education level, medication use, side effects, attitudes to preventer inhaler use, inhaler technique review and respiratory specialist review between patients who accurately reported 'wellcontrolled' asthma and those who did not. Independent risk factors associated with inaccurately reported 'well-controlled' asthma were: having taken a maximum of 5-12 puffs or more of reliever inhaler on at least one day within the previous 4 weeks; being female; having seen a respiratory specialist more than a year ago (rather than in the previous year); and having required oral corticosteroids for worsening asthma in the previous year. The study highlighted the significant hidden burden associated with under-recognition of poor asthma control, on the part of the patient and the need for targeted interventions designed to address the continuing discrepancy between perceived and actual disease control.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) has facilitated the publication of this paper. The iHARP database was funded by unrestricted grants from Mundipharma International Limited and Optimum Patient Care Global Ltd, which is a social enterprise that focuses on quality improvement in clinical practice. The sponsor was not involved in data analysis or the interpretation of the results.es_ES
dc.format.page43es_ES
dc.format.volume29es_ES
dc.identifier.citationKritikos V, Price D, Papi A, Infantino A, Stallberg B, Ryan D, et al. A multinational observational study identifying primary care patients at risk of overestimation of asthma control. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Dec 05;29:43.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41533-019-0156-4
dc.identifier.e-issn2055-1010es_ES
dc.identifier.journalNPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicinees_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/12620
dc.identifier.pubmedID31804501es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL630061203
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85075991978
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/22780
dc.identifier.wos502995200001
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-019-0156-4en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.decsIncidencia*
dc.subject.decsResultado del Tratamiento*
dc.subject.decsAntiasmáticos*
dc.subject.decsFemenino*
dc.subject.decsSuecia*
dc.subject.decsNoruega*
dc.subject.decsAdministración por Inhalación*
dc.subject.decsMasculino*
dc.subject.decsEstudios Transversales*
dc.subject.decsReino Unido*
dc.subject.decsBroncodilatadores*
dc.subject.decsQuimioterapia Combinada*
dc.subject.decsFrancia*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsPersona de Mediana Edad*
dc.subject.decsPaíses Bajos*
dc.subject.decsAsma*
dc.subject.decsCorticoesteroides*
dc.subject.decsAtención Primaria de Salud*
dc.subject.decsEspaña*
dc.subject.meshAsthma*
dc.subject.meshSpain*
dc.subject.meshAdrenal Cortex Hormones*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshDrug Therapy, Combination*
dc.subject.meshFrance*
dc.subject.meshNetherlands*
dc.subject.meshBronchodilator Agents*
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged*
dc.subject.meshCross-Sectional Studies*
dc.subject.meshUnited Kingdom*
dc.subject.meshNorway*
dc.subject.meshSweden*
dc.subject.meshMale*
dc.subject.meshAdministration, Inhalation*
dc.subject.meshAnti-Asthmatic Agents*
dc.subject.meshFemale*
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome*
dc.subject.meshPrimary Health Care*
dc.subject.meshIncidence*
dc.titleA multinational observational study identifying primary care patients at risk of overestimation of asthma controlen
dc.typeresearch articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublication301fb00e-338e-4f8c-beaa-f9d8f4fefcc0
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery301fb00e-338e-4f8c-beaa-f9d8f4fefcc0

Files