Publication:
Darunavir/cobicistat showing similar effectiveness as darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy despite lower trough concentrations.

dc.contributor.authorGutierrez-Valencia, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorTrujillo-Rodriguez, Maria
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Magdaleno, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorEspinosa, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorViciana, Pompeyo
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Cortés, Luis F
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T09:55:47Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T09:55:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: When darunavir (DRV) 800 mg is boosted with 150 mg cobicistat (DRVcobi), DRV trough concentration (Ctrough) is about 30% lower as compared to 100 mg ritonavir (DRVrtv). DRVcobi shows similar virological efficacy as DRVrtv when combined with two nucleos(t)ide analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, but it is unknown whether a lower DRV Ctrough would undermine the effectiveness of DRVcobi when given as monotherapy (mtDRVcobi). Methods: Prospective observational study on virologically suppressed HIV-infected subjects who switched to mtDRVcobi . Virological failure was defined as two consecutive HIV-RNA >200 copies/mL. Efficacy was evaluated by intention-to-treat (ITT) and on-treatment (OT) analyses, and compared with data from a previous cohort of subjects on mtDRVrtv conducted at our centre. Plasma DRV Ctrough was measured using LC-MS/MS. Results: A total of 234 subjects were enrolled. At week 96, the efficacy rates were 67.8% (CI95 , 61.8 to 73.7) by ITT and 86.9% (CI95 , 78.0 to 87.7) by OT analyses. The corresponding rates in our historical DRVrtv controls were 67.6% (CI95 , 60.0 to 75.2) and 83.6% (CI95 : 77.2 to 90.0). A total of 135 DRV determinations were performed in 83 subjects throughout the follow-up period, with a median plasma DRV Ctrough of 1305 ng/mL (range, 150 to 5895) compared with 1710 ng/mL (range, 200 to 3838) in subjects on monotherapy with DRVrtv (p = 0.05). Conclusions: DRV Ctrough was lower in HIV-infected subjects receiving DRVcobi than with DRVrtv . However, this did not appear to influence the efficacy of DRVcobi , when administered as monotherapy.
dc.format.number2es_ES
dc.format.volume21es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jia2.25072
dc.identifier.e-issn1758-2652es_ES
dc.identifier.journalJournal of the International AIDS Societyes_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/12115
dc.identifier.pubmedID29430854es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/25242
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCtrough
dc.subjectDarunavir
dc.subjectCobicistat
dc.subjectMonotherapy
dc.subjectPharmacokinetic
dc.subjectRitonavir
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAnti-HIV Agents
dc.subject.meshCobicistat
dc.subject.meshDarunavir
dc.subject.meshDrug Therapy, Combination
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHIV Infections
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies
dc.subject.meshReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
dc.subject.meshRitonavir
dc.subject.meshViral Load
dc.titleDarunavir/cobicistat showing similar effectiveness as darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy despite lower trough concentrations.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files