Publication:
Paired maternal and fetal metabolomics reveal a differential fingerprint in preeclampsia versus fetal growth restriction.

dc.contributor.authorYoussef, Lina
dc.contributor.authorSimões, Rui V
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Jezid
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Martín, María Luisa
dc.contributor.authorPaules, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorCrovetto, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorAmigó, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorCañellas, Nicolau
dc.contributor.authorGratacos, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorCrispi, Fatima
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T15:29:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T15:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-13
dc.description.abstractPreeclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) are both placenta-mediated disorders with unclear pathogenesis. Metabolomics of maternal and fetal pairs might help in understanding these disorders. We recruited prospectively pregnancies with normotensive FGR, PE without FGR, PE + FGR and uncomplicated pregnancies as controls. Nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics were applied on plasma samples collected at delivery. Advanced lipoprotein, glycoprotein and choline profiling was performed using the Liposcale test. The software package Dolphin was used to quantify 24 low-molecular-weight metabolites. Statistical analysis comprised the comparison between each group of complicated pregnancies versus controls, considering 5% false discovery rate correction. Lipid profiles were altered in accordance with the clinical presentation of these disorders. Specifically, PE mothers and FGR fetuses (with or without FGR or PE, respectively) exhibited a pro-atherogenic and pro-inflammatory profile, with higher concentrations of triglycerides, remnant cholesterol (VLDL, IDL) and Glc/GalNAc-linked and lipid-associated glycoproteins compared to controls. Low-molecular-weight metabolites were extensively disturbed in preeclamptic mothers, with or without FGR. Growth restricted fetuses in the presence of PE showed changes in low-molecular-weight metabolites similar to their mothers (increased creatine and creatinine), while normotensive FGR fetuses presented scarce differences, consistent with undernutrition (lower isoleucine). Further research is warranted to clarify maternal and fetal adaptations to PE and FGR.
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page14422es_ES
dc.format.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-021-93936-9
dc.identifier.e-issn2045-2322es_ES
dc.identifier.journalScientific reportses_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/18197
dc.identifier.pubmedID34257400es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18402
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshFetal Growth Retardation
dc.subject.meshFetus
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshMetabolomics
dc.subject.meshPre-Eclampsia
dc.subject.meshPregnancy
dc.titlePaired maternal and fetal metabolomics reveal a differential fingerprint in preeclampsia versus fetal growth restriction.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files