Publication:
Comparison of four PCR methods for efficient detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in routine diagnostics

dc.contributor.authorSeiringer, Peter
dc.contributor.authorPritsch, Michael
dc.contributor.authorFlores-Chavez, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMarchisio, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorHelfrich, Kerstin
dc.contributor.authorMengele, Carolin
dc.contributor.authorHohnerlein, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorBretzel, Gisela
dc.contributor.authorLöscher, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHoelscher, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBerens-Riha, Nicole
dc.contributor.funderGerman Center for Infection Research (Alemania)
dc.contributor.funderLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München (Alemania)
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T12:35:21Z
dc.date.available2019-02-13T12:35:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-07
dc.description.abstractDue to increased migration, Chagas disease has become an international health problem. Reliable diagnosis of chronically infected people is crucial for prevention of non-vectorial transmission as well as treatment. This study compared four distinct PCR methods for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA for the use in well-equipped routine diagnostic laboratories. DNA was extracted of T. cruzi-positive and negative patients' blood samples and cultured T. cruzi, T. rangeli as well as Leishmania spp. One conventional and two real-time PCR methods targeting a repetitive Sat-DNA sequence as well as one conventional PCR method targeting the variable region of the kDNA minicircle were compared for sensitivity, intra- and interassay precision, limit of detection, specificity and cross-reactivity. Considering the performance, costs and ease of use, an algorithm for PCR-diagnosis of patients with a positive serology for T. cruzi antibodies was developed.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the German Center for InfectionResearch through the MD program (to MH, MP and PS). Overall,the project wasfinanced by the University of Munich (LMU).es_ES
dc.format.number3es_ES
dc.format.page232es_ES
dc.format.volume88es_ES
dc.identifier.citationDiagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;88(3):225-232es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.04.003es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1879-0070es_ES
dc.identifier.issn07328893es_ES
dc.identifier.journalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseasees_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID28456430es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/7174
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.04.003es_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Microbiología (CNM)es_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectComparisones_ES
dc.subjectConventionales_ES
dc.subjectDiagnosises_ES
dc.subjectPCRes_ES
dc.subjectReal-timees_ES
dc.subjectTrypanosoma cruzies_ES
dc.subject.meshAdolescentes_ES
dc.subject.meshAdultes_ES
dc.subject.meshBloodes_ES
dc.subject.meshChagas Diseasees_ES
dc.subject.meshChild, Preschooles_ES
dc.subject.meshFemalees_ES
dc.subject.meshHumanses_ES
dc.subject.meshMalees_ES
dc.subject.meshMiddle Agedes_ES
dc.subject.meshMolecular Diagnostic Techniqueses_ES
dc.subject.meshPolymerase Chain Reactiones_ES
dc.titleComparison of four PCR methods for efficient detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in routine diagnosticses_ES
dc.typeresearch articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf7f5ae06-0e03-4f0c-9ec3-b1afd845f525
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf7f5ae06-0e03-4f0c-9ec3-b1afd845f525
relation.isFunderOfPublication3fc80ec8-94c0-4182-b9ea-44cbb787d437
relation.isFunderOfPublication9b8ced6e-91a4-49b2-a9f9-770537912067
relation.isFunderOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3fc80ec8-94c0-4182-b9ea-44cbb787d437
relation.isPublisherOfPublication7d471502-7bd5-4f7a-90a4-8274382509ef
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7d471502-7bd5-4f7a-90a4-8274382509ef

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ComparisonOfFourPCR_2017.pdf
Size:
613.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: