Publication:
Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain.

dc.contributor.authorEsteve, Rosa
dc.contributor.authorReyes-Pérez, Ángela
dc.contributor.authorRamírez-Maestre, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorFuentes-Bravo, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorde la Vega, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorRuíz-Párraga, Gema T
dc.contributor.authorSerrano-Ibáñez, Elena R
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Martínez, Alicia E
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T14:58:06Z
dc.date.available2024-02-27T14:58:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-07
dc.description.abstractAccurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R). We used the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) as criterion measure to assess the capacity of each tool to identify patients misusing opioids at the time of the assessment. Eighteen months later, we used the COMM and the Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) to assess their predictive capacity. In total, 147 people with noncancer chronic pain participated in the diagnostic study, and 42 in the predictive study. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the SOAPP-R had an excellent capacity to identify participants who were misusing opioids at the time of assessment (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827). The diagnostic capacity of the ORT was close to acceptable (AUC = 0.649-0.669), whereas its predictive capacity was poor (AUC = 0.522-0.554). The predictive capacity of the SOAPP-R was close to acceptable regarding misuse (AUC = 0.672) and poor regarding abuse (AUC = 0.423). In the setting of Spanish-speaking communities, clinicians should be cautious when using these instruments to make decisions on opioid administration. Further research is needed on the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of both instruments.
dc.format.number2es_ES
dc.format.page493-510es_ES
dc.format.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40122-022-00356-2
dc.identifier.issn2193-8237
dc.identifier.journalPain and therapyes_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/21585
dc.identifier.pubmedID35128624es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18599
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectOpioid Risk Tool
dc.subjectOpioid abuse
dc.subjectOpioid misuse
dc.subjectScreener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised
dc.subjectScreening tools
dc.titleDiagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files