Publication:
Systematically evaluating DOTATATE and FDG as PET immuno-imaging tracers of cardiovascular inflammation

dc.contributor.authorToner, Yohana C
dc.contributor.authorGhotbi, Adam A
dc.contributor.authorNaidu, Sonum
dc.contributor.authorSakurai, Ken
dc.contributor.authorvan Leent, Mandy M T
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorOrdikhani, Farideh
dc.contributor.authorAmadori, Letizia
dc.contributor.authorSofias, Alexandros Marios
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Elizabeth L
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Nathaniel
dc.contributor.authorMunitz, Jazz
dc.contributor.authorSenders, Max L
dc.contributor.authorMason, Christian
dc.contributor.authorReiner, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSoultanidis, Georgios
dc.contributor.authorTarkin, Jason M
dc.contributor.authorRudd, James H F
dc.contributor.authorGiannarelli, Chiara
dc.contributor.authorOchando, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Medina, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorKjaer, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorMulder, Willem J M
dc.contributor.authorFayad, Zahi A
dc.contributor.authorCalcagno, Claudia
dc.contributor.funderLundbeck Foundationes_ES
dc.contributor.funderDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Alemania)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderWellcome Trustes_ES
dc.contributor.funderNIHR - Cambridge Biomedical Research Centeres_ES
dc.contributor.funderBritish Heart Foundationes_ES
dc.contributor.funderHigher Education Funding Council for Englandes_ES
dc.contributor.funderEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Reino Unido)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (Estados Unidos)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderNIH - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (Estados Unidos)es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-05T07:06:31Z
dc.date.available2022-08-05T07:06:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-13
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, cardiovascular immuno-imaging by positron emission tomography (PET) has undergone tremendous progress in preclinical settings. Clinically, two approved PET tracers hold great potential for inflammation imaging in cardiovascular patients, namely FDG and DOTATATE. While the former is a widely applied metabolic tracer, DOTATATE is a relatively new PET tracer targeting the somatostatin receptor 2 (SST2). In the current study, we performed a detailed, head-to-head comparison of DOTATATE-based radiotracers and [18F]F-FDG in mouse and rabbit models of cardiovascular inflammation. For mouse experiments, we labeled DOTATATE with the long-lived isotope [64Cu]Cu to enable studying the tracer's mode of action by complementing in vivo PET/CT experiments with thorough ex vivo immunological analyses. For translational PET/MRI rabbit studies, we employed the more widely clinically used [68Ga]Ga-labeled DOTATATE, which was approved by the FDA in 2016. DOTATATE's pharmacokinetics and timed biodistribution were determined in control and atherosclerotic mice and rabbits by ex vivo gamma counting of blood and organs. Additionally, we performed in vivo PET/CT experiments in mice with atherosclerosis, mice subjected to myocardial infarction and control animals, using both [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE and [18F]F-FDG. To evaluate differences in the tracers' cellular specificity, we performed ensuing ex vivo flow cytometry and gamma counting. In mice subjected to myocardial infarction, in vivo [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET showed higher differential uptake between infarcted (SUVmax 1.3, IQR, 1.2-1.4, N = 4) and remote myocardium (SUVmax 0.7, IQR, 0.5-0.8, N = 4, p = 0.0286), and with respect to controls (SUVmax 0.6, IQR, 0.5-0.7, N = 4, p = 0.0286), than [18F]F-FDG PET. In atherosclerotic mice, [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET aortic signal, but not [18F]F-FDG PET, was higher compared to controls (SUVmax 1.1, IQR, 0.9-1.3 and 0.5, IQR, 0.5-0.6, respectively, N = 4, p = 0.0286). In both models, [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE demonstrated preferential accumulation in macrophages with respect to other myeloid cells, while [18F]F-FDG was taken up by macrophages and other leukocytes. In a translational PET/MRI study in atherosclerotic rabbits, we then compared [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [18F]F-FDG for the assessment of aortic inflammation, combined with ex vivo radiometric assays and near-infrared imaging of macrophage burden. Rabbit experiments showed significantly higher aortic accumulation of both [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [18F]F-FDG in atherosclerotic (SUVmax 0.415, IQR, 0.338-0.499, N = 32 and 0.446, IQR, 0.387-0.536, N = 27, respectively) compared to control animals (SUVmax 0.253, IQR, 0.197-0.285, p = 0.0002, N = 10 and 0.349, IQR, 0.299-0.423, p = 0.0159, N = 11, respectively). In conclusion, we present a detailed, head-to-head comparison of the novel SST2-specific tracer DOTATATE and the validated metabolic tracer [18F]F-FDG for the evaluation of inflammation in small animal models of cardiovascular disease. Our results support further investigations on the use of DOTATATE to assess cardiovascular inflammation as a complementary readout to the widely used [18F]F-FDG.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAAG was supported by The Lundbeck Foundation R251-2017-870. FO was supported by an Institutional Research Training Grant T32CA078207. AM was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MA7059/1. TR was supported by MSK Cancer Center P30 P30 CA008748. JMT was supported by the Wellcome Trust (211100/Z/18/Z). JHFR is part-supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, the British Heart Foundation, Higher Education Funding Council for England, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. CG was supported by NIH-NHLBI R01 HL153712-01, NIH-NCATS UH3TR002067, American Heart Association 20SFRN35210252 and Chan Zuckerberg Initiative NFL-2020-218415. ZAF was supported by NIH/NHLBI R01 HL135878.es_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page6185es_ES
dc.format.volume12es_ES
dc.identifier.citationSci Rep. 2022 Apr 13;12(1):6185.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-022-09590-2es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn2045-2322es_ES
dc.identifier.journalScientific Reportses_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID35418569es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/14855
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09590-2es_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Microbiologíaes_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshAtherosclerosises_ES
dc.subject.meshMyocardial Infarctiones_ES
dc.subject.meshOrganometallic Compoundses_ES
dc.subject.meshAnimalses_ES
dc.subject.meshFluorodeoxyglucose F18es_ES
dc.subject.meshGallium Radioisotopeses_ES
dc.subject.meshHumanses_ES
dc.subject.meshInflammationes_ES
dc.subject.meshMicees_ES
dc.subject.meshPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomographyes_ES
dc.subject.meshPositron-Emission Tomographyes_ES
dc.subject.meshRabbitses_ES
dc.subject.meshRadionuclide Imaginges_ES
dc.subject.meshRadiopharmaceuticalses_ES
dc.subject.meshTissue Distributiones_ES
dc.titleSystematically evaluating DOTATATE and FDG as PET immuno-imaging tracers of cardiovascular inflammationes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf4411902-c52c-4e77-afff-0f9d9e8d9e9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication83f5958f-fd59-4a29-90b6-e4d6e25a24e4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf4411902-c52c-4e77-afff-0f9d9e8d9e9f

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SystematicallyEvaluatingDOTATATEAnd_2022.pdf
Size:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artículo principal
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SystematicallyEvaluatingDOTATATEAndSupplementaryInformation_2022.pdf
Size:
1023.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Information