Publication: Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study).
| dc.contributor.author | Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gómez-Doblas, Juan J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Millán-Gómez, Mercedes | |
| dc.contributor.author | López-Carmona, María D | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guijarro-Merino, Ricardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Teresa-Galván, Eduardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bernal-López, M Rosa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gómez-Huelgas, Ricardo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-08T14:41:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-08T14:41:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-09-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The use of noninsulin antihyperglycaemic drugs in the hospital setting has not yet been fully described. This observational study compared the efficacy and safety of the standard basal-bolus insulin regimen versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (linagliptin) plus basal insulin in medicine department inpatients in real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively enrolled non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia and no injectable treatments at home who were treated with a hospital antihyperglycaemic regimen (basal-bolus insulin, or linagliptin-basal insulin) between January 2016 and December 2017. Propensity score was used to match patients in both treatment groups and a comparative analysis was conducted to test the significance of differences between groups. After matched-pair analysis, 227 patients were included per group. No differences were shown between basal-bolus versus linagliptin-basal regimens for the mean daily blood glucose concentration after admission (standardized difference = 0.011), number of blood glucose readings between 100⁻140 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.017) and >200 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.021), or treatment failures (standardized difference = 0.011). Patients on basal-bolus insulin received higher total insulin doses and a higher daily number of injections (standardized differences = 0.298 and 0.301, respectively). Basal and supplemental rapid-acting insulin doses were similar (standardized differences = 0.003 and 0.012, respectively). There were no differences in hospital stay length (standardized difference = 0.003), hypoglycaemic events (standardized difference = 0.018), or hospital complications (standardized difference = 0.010) between groups. This study shows that in real-world clinical practice, the linagliptin-basal insulin regimen was as effective and safe as the standard basal-bolus regimen in non-critical patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia treated at home without injectable therapies. | |
| dc.format.number | 9 | es_ES |
| dc.format.volume | 7 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jcm7090271 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0383 | |
| dc.identifier.journal | Journal of clinical medicine | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.other | http://hdl.handle.net/10668/12937 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmedID | 30208631 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/17628 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.rights.license | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | diabetes mellitus | |
| dc.subject | hospital care | |
| dc.subject | inpatient hyperglycaemia | |
| dc.subject | linagliptin | |
| dc.title | Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study). | |
| dc.type | research article | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |


