Publication:
Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study).

dc.contributor.authorPérez-Belmonte, Luis M
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Doblas, Juan J
dc.contributor.authorMillán-Gómez, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Carmona, María D
dc.contributor.authorGuijarro-Merino, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorde Teresa-Galván, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Navarro, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBernal-López, M Rosa
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Huelgas, Ricardo
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T14:41:49Z
dc.date.available2024-02-08T14:41:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-11
dc.description.abstractThe use of noninsulin antihyperglycaemic drugs in the hospital setting has not yet been fully described. This observational study compared the efficacy and safety of the standard basal-bolus insulin regimen versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (linagliptin) plus basal insulin in medicine department inpatients in real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively enrolled non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia and no injectable treatments at home who were treated with a hospital antihyperglycaemic regimen (basal-bolus insulin, or linagliptin-basal insulin) between January 2016 and December 2017. Propensity score was used to match patients in both treatment groups and a comparative analysis was conducted to test the significance of differences between groups. After matched-pair analysis, 227 patients were included per group. No differences were shown between basal-bolus versus linagliptin-basal regimens for the mean daily blood glucose concentration after admission (standardized difference = 0.011), number of blood glucose readings between 100⁻140 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.017) and >200 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.021), or treatment failures (standardized difference = 0.011). Patients on basal-bolus insulin received higher total insulin doses and a higher daily number of injections (standardized differences = 0.298 and 0.301, respectively). Basal and supplemental rapid-acting insulin doses were similar (standardized differences = 0.003 and 0.012, respectively). There were no differences in hospital stay length (standardized difference = 0.003), hypoglycaemic events (standardized difference = 0.018), or hospital complications (standardized difference = 0.010) between groups. This study shows that in real-world clinical practice, the linagliptin-basal insulin regimen was as effective and safe as the standard basal-bolus regimen in non-critical patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia treated at home without injectable therapies.
dc.format.number9es_ES
dc.format.volume7es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm7090271
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.journalJournal of clinical medicinees_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/12937
dc.identifier.pubmedID30208631es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/17628
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitus
dc.subjecthospital care
dc.subjectinpatient hyperglycaemia
dc.subjectlinagliptin
dc.titleUse of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study).
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files