Publication: Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica
| dc.contributor.author | Paulos, Silvia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saugar, Jose Maria | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Lucio, Aida | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fuentes Corripio, Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mateo, María | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carmena, David | |
| dc.contributor.funder | European University of Madrid (España) | |
| dc.contributor.funder | Instituto de Salud Carlos III | |
| dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-25T12:45:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-11-25T12:45:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular panels are relentlessly replacing conventional methods for the detection of enteric pathogens from stool samples in clinical and research laboratories. Here we evaluated four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica. METHODS: The diagnostic performance of the Gastroenteritis/Parasite Panel I (Diagenode), the RIDAGENE Parasitic Stool Panel (R-Biopharm), the Allplex Gastrointestinal Parasite Panel 4 (Seegene) and the FTD Stool Parasites (Fast Track) real-time PCR methods was assessed against a reference panel of 126 well-characterized DNA samples including Cryptosporidium hominis (n = 29), Cryptosporidium parvum (n = 3), Giardia duodenalis (n = 47), Entamoeba histolytica (n = 3), other parasite species (n = 20), and apparently healthy subjects (n = 24). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Obtained diagnostic sensitivities ranged from 53-88% for Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, and from 68-100% for G. duodenalis. The R-Biopharm method achieved the best performance for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum both in terms of diagnostic sensitivity (87.5%) and detection limit (a 100-fold increase compared to other tests). The Fast Track method was particularly suited for the detection of G. duodenalis, achieving a 100% sensitivity and a detection limit at least 10-fold superior. Detection of E. histolytica was similarly achieved by all compared methods except Diagenode. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance varied largely depending on the method used and the targeted pathogen species. Factors including test sensitivity/specificity, cost, patient population surveyed, laboratory workflow, and diagnostic algorithm should be carefully considered when choosing the most appropriate multiplex PCR platform. | es_ES |
| dc.description.peerreviewed | Sí | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study was funded by the European University of Madrid (Spain), under project 2015/UEM21 (MM). Additional funding was also provided by the Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain), under projects CP12/03081 (DC) and PI13/01106 (IF).The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. | es_ES |
| dc.format.number | 4 | es_ES |
| dc.format.page | e0215068 | es_ES |
| dc.format.volume | 14 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.citation | PLoS One. 2019 Apr 8;14(4):e0215068. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0215068 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.e-issn | 1932-6203 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.journal | PloS one | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.pubmedID | 30958837 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/8695 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Public Library of Science (PLOS) | es_ES |
| dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/CP12/03081 (DC) | es_ES |
| dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PI13/01106 (IF) | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215068 | es_ES |
| dc.repisalud.centro | ISCIII::Centro Nacional de Microbiología | es_ES |
| dc.repisalud.institucion | ISCIII | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.title | Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 2036bb40-097f-406a-b634-f77164674c2b | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 9884d7ab-a306-46d5-bff5-118c869d748f | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 64dc08af-453e-4a4b-894a-2afff0088355 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | e9e7e54b-4def-4f3c-979c-d049c70e51ce | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 2036bb40-097f-406a-b634-f77164674c2b |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- ComparativePerformanceEvaluationOf_2019.pdf
- Size:
- 606.96 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:


