Publication:
Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica

dc.contributor.authorPaulos, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorSaugar, Jose Maria
dc.contributor.authorde Lucio, Aida
dc.contributor.authorFuentes Corripio, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorMateo, María
dc.contributor.authorCarmena, David
dc.contributor.funderEuropean University of Madrid (España)
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-25T12:45:50Z
dc.date.available2019-11-25T12:45:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular panels are relentlessly replacing conventional methods for the detection of enteric pathogens from stool samples in clinical and research laboratories. Here we evaluated four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica. METHODS: The diagnostic performance of the Gastroenteritis/Parasite Panel I (Diagenode), the RIDAGENE Parasitic Stool Panel (R-Biopharm), the Allplex Gastrointestinal Parasite Panel 4 (Seegene) and the FTD Stool Parasites (Fast Track) real-time PCR methods was assessed against a reference panel of 126 well-characterized DNA samples including Cryptosporidium hominis (n = 29), Cryptosporidium parvum (n = 3), Giardia duodenalis (n = 47), Entamoeba histolytica (n = 3), other parasite species (n = 20), and apparently healthy subjects (n = 24). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Obtained diagnostic sensitivities ranged from 53-88% for Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, and from 68-100% for G. duodenalis. The R-Biopharm method achieved the best performance for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum both in terms of diagnostic sensitivity (87.5%) and detection limit (a 100-fold increase compared to other tests). The Fast Track method was particularly suited for the detection of G. duodenalis, achieving a 100% sensitivity and a detection limit at least 10-fold superior. Detection of E. histolytica was similarly achieved by all compared methods except Diagenode. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance varied largely depending on the method used and the targeted pathogen species. Factors including test sensitivity/specificity, cost, patient population surveyed, laboratory workflow, and diagnostic algorithm should be carefully considered when choosing the most appropriate multiplex PCR platform.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the European University of Madrid (Spain), under project 2015/UEM21 (MM). Additional funding was also provided by the Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain), under projects CP12/03081 (DC) and PI13/01106 (IF).The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.es_ES
dc.format.number4es_ES
dc.format.pagee0215068es_ES
dc.format.volume14es_ES
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One. 2019 Apr 8;14(4):e0215068.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0215068es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1932-6203es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203es_ES
dc.identifier.journalPloS onees_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID30958837es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/8695
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLOS)es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/CP12/03081 (DC)es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PI13/01106 (IF)es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215068es_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Microbiologíaes_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleComparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolyticaes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2036bb40-097f-406a-b634-f77164674c2b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9884d7ab-a306-46d5-bff5-118c869d748f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication64dc08af-453e-4a4b-894a-2afff0088355
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione9e7e54b-4def-4f3c-979c-d049c70e51ce
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2036bb40-097f-406a-b634-f77164674c2b

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ComparativePerformanceEvaluationOf_2019.pdf
Size:
606.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: