Publication:
Care of peripheral intravenous catheters in three hospitals in Spain: Mapping clinical outcomes and implementation of clinical practice guidelines

dc.contributor.authorBlanco-Mavillard, Ian
dc.contributor.authorParra-Garcia, Gaizka
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Fernandez, Ismael
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Calero, Miguel Angel
dc.contributor.authorPersonat Labrador, Almudena
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Sánchez, Enrique
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T09:15:54Z
dc.date.available2024-09-13T09:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-02
dc.description.abstractBackground: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most widely used invasive devices worldwide. Up to 42% of PIVCs are prematurely removed during intravenous therapy due to failure. To date, there have been few systematic attempts in European hospitals to measure adherence to recommendations to mitigate PIVC failures. Aim: To analyse the clinical outcomes from clinical practice guideline recommendations for PIVC care on different hospital types and environments. Methods: We conducted an observational study in three hospitals in Spain from December 2017 to April 2018. The adherence to recommendations was monitored via visual inspection in situ evaluations of all PIVCs inserted in adults admitted. Context and clinical characteristics were collected by an evaluation tool, analysing data descriptively. Results: 646 PIVCs inserted in 624 patients were monitored, which only 52.7% knew about their PIVC. Regarding PIVC insertion, 3.4% (22/646) patients had at least 2 PIVCs simultaneously. The majority of PIVCs were 20G (319/646; 49.4%) and were secured with transparent polyurethane dressing (605/646; 93.7%). Most PIVCs (357/646; 55.3%) had a free insertion site during the visual inspection at first sight. We identified 342/646 (53%) transparent dressings in optimal conditions (clean, dry, and intact dressing). PIVC dressings in medical wards were much more likely to be in intact conditions than those in surgical wards (234/399, 58.7% vs. 108/247, 43.7%). We identified 55/646 (8.5%) PIVCs without infusion in the last 24 hours and 58/646 (9.0%) PIVCs without infusion for more than 24 hours. Regarding PIVC failure, 74 (11.5%) adverse events were identified, all of them reflecting clinical manifestation of phlebitis. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the clinical outcome indicators from CPG for PIVC care were moderate, highlighting differences between hospital environments and types. Also, we observed that nearly 50% of patients did not know what a PIVC is.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by The College of Nurses of the Balearic Islands under grant number PI2017/0192. The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions of The College of Nurses of the Balearic Islands. EC-S is also an NIHR Senior Nurse and Midwife Research Leader, and recognises the support of the NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre and the BRC.es_ES
dc.format.number10es_ES
dc.format.pagee0240086es_ES
dc.format.volume15es_ES
dc.identifier.citationBlanco-Mavillard I, Parra-Garcia G, Fernandez-Fernandez I, Rodriguez-Calero MA, Personat-Labrador C, Castro-Sanchez E. Care of peripheral intravenous catheters in three hospitals in Spain: Mapping clinical outcomes and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 02;15(10):e0240086.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0240086
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.journalPloS Onees_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/9098
dc.identifier.pubmedID33007001es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL2008021802
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092213749
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/23029
dc.identifier.wos577103500020
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLOS)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240086en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.decsGuías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto*
dc.subject.decsResultado del Tratamiento*
dc.subject.decsFemenino*
dc.subject.decsHospitales*
dc.subject.decsMasculino*
dc.subject.decsEnfermeras y Enfermeros*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsPersona de Mediana Edad*
dc.subject.decsAdulto Joven*
dc.subject.decsCateterismo Periférico*
dc.subject.decsAdulto*
dc.subject.decsAdhesión a Directriz*
dc.subject.decsEspaña*
dc.subject.meshCatheterization, Peripheral*
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult*
dc.subject.meshSpain*
dc.subject.meshAdult*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshNurses*
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged*
dc.subject.meshHospitals*
dc.subject.meshMale*
dc.subject.meshFemale*
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome*
dc.subject.meshGuideline Adherence*
dc.subject.meshPractice Guidelines as Topic*
dc.titleCare of peripheral intravenous catheters in three hospitals in Spain: Mapping clinical outcomes and implementation of clinical practice guidelinesen
dc.typeresearch articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublicationa2759e3d-0d58-4e8a-9fcd-c6130ee333d1
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya2759e3d-0d58-4e8a-9fcd-c6130ee333d1

Files