Publication:
Acceptability and feasibility of two interventions in the MooDFOOD Trial: a food-related depression prevention randomised controlled trial in overweight adults with subsyndromal symptoms of depression

dc.contributor.authorOwens, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Edward
dc.contributor.authorBot, Mariska
dc.contributor.authorBrouwer, Ingeborg Annemarie
dc.contributor.authorRoca, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorKohls, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorPenninx, Brenda
dc.contributor.authorvan Grootheest, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorCabout, Mieke
dc.contributor.authorHegerl, Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorGili, Margalida
dc.contributor.authorVisser, Marjolein
dc.contributor.authorMooDFOOD Prevention Trial
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T09:11:46Z
dc.date.available2024-09-13T09:11:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We report on the acceptability, feasibility, dose-response relationship and adherence of two nutritional strategies to improve mood (multinutrient supplements; food-related behavioural activation (F-BA)) studied in a randomised controlled depression prevention trial (the Multi-country cOllaborative project on the rOle of Diet, Food-related behaviour, and Obesity in the prevention of Depression (MooDFOOD) Trial). We also assessed baseline determinants of adherence and assessed whether better adherence resulted in lower depressive symptoms. Design: Randomised controlled trial with a 2x2 factorial design conducted between 2015 and 2017. Setting Germany, the Netherlands, UK and Spain. Participants: Community sample of 1025 overweight adults with elevated depressive symptoms without a current episode of major depressive disorder. Main eligibility criteria included age (18-75 years), being overweight or obese, and having at least mild depressive symptoms, shown by a Patient Health Questionnaire Score of >= 5. A total of 76% of the sample was retained at the 12-month follow-up. Interventions Daily nutritional supplements versus pill placebo or an F-BA therapy, delivered in individual and group sessions versus no behavioural intervention over a 1-year period. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome: self-reported acceptability of the interventions. Secondary outcomes: adherence and self-reported depressive symptoms. Results Most participants reported that the F-BA was acceptable (83.61%), feasible to do (65.91%) and would recommend it to a friend (84.57%). Individual F-BA sessions (88.10%) were significantly more often rated as positive than group F-BA sessions (70.17%) and supplements (28.59%). There were statistically significant reductions in depressive symptoms for those who both adhered to the F-BA intervention and had a history of depression (B=-0.08, SE=0.03, p=0.012) versus those who had no history of depression. Supplement intake had no effect on depressive symptoms irrespective of adherence. Conclusions: F-BA may have scope for development as a depression prevention intervention and public health strategy but further refinement and testing are needed.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the European Union FP7 MooDFOOD Project 'Multi-country collaborative project on the role of Diet, food related behaviour, and Obesity in the prevention of Depression' (grant agreement no. 613598). This work is supported in the UK by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), through the Primary Care Research Network and the NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility.es_ES
dc.format.number9es_ES
dc.format.pagee034025es_ES
dc.format.volume10es_ES
dc.identifier.citationOwens M, Watkins E, Bot M, Brouwer Ingeborg A, Roca M, Kohls E, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of two interventions in the MooDFOOD Trial: a food-related depression prevention randomised controlled trial in overweight adults with subsyndromal symptoms of depression. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e034025.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034025
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openes_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/12208
dc.identifier.pubmedID32933954es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL632853128
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091052159
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/22872
dc.identifier.wos573829200004
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034025en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectDepression & mood disorders
dc.subjectNutrition & dietetics
dc.subjectPreventive medicine
dc.subjectMental health
dc.subjectClinical trials
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsPersona de Mediana Edad*
dc.subject.decsAdulto Joven*
dc.subject.decsDepresión*
dc.subject.decsAnciano*
dc.subject.decsAdulto*
dc.subject.decsSobrepeso*
dc.subject.decsAdolescente*
dc.subject.decsEstudios de Factibilidad*
dc.subject.meshFeasibility Studies*
dc.subject.meshAged*
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult*
dc.subject.meshAdult*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshDepression*
dc.subject.meshAdolescent*
dc.subject.meshOverweight*
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged*
dc.titleAcceptability and feasibility of two interventions in the MooDFOOD Trial: a food-related depression prevention randomised controlled trial in overweight adults with subsyndromal symptoms of depressionen
dc.typeresearch articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublication7ffe3d60-d8d6-4023-8234-aa60d8420845
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7ffe3d60-d8d6-4023-8234-aa60d8420845

Files