Publication:
Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.

dc.contributor.authorKnox, Emily Caitlin Lily
dc.contributor.authorMateo-Rodríguez, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorDaponte-Codina, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRosell-Ortiz, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorSolá-Muñoz, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorCodina-Rodríguez, Antía
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Azpiazu, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (España)
dc.contributor.funderNational Institutes of Health (Estados Unidos)
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-10T09:38:21Z
dc.date.available2025-07-10T09:38:21Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-26
dc.description.abstractA systematic review was performed with the aim of analysing potential sex differences in the overall treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). : Studies published between January 2011 and November 2023 that conducted a sex-based analysis of the provision of any type of therapeutic measure to treat CHD were included. A search was performed of the Web of Science database in November 2023, resulting in 9070 articles. Study quality was examined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A worksheet was produced to extract data pertaining to the title, year of publication, sample, context, study design, dependent variables, time-frame, treatment type, and outcomes reported by each article. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, and the research protocol was submitted to PROSPERO (CRD42022330238). : A total of 80 articles presenting data representing 560.070,624 individual datapoints were selected to comprise the final sample. The main findings revealed that the majority of studies highlighted inequalities that disadvantaged females in all analysed treatment categories (pharmacological treatment, invasive interventions, rehabilitation programmes, and other treatment types). : Despite the abundance of evidence on the need to improve healthcare provision to females with CHD, few studies examined the reasons or mechanisms underlying the inequalities identified.
dc.description.peerreviewed
dc.description.tableofcontentsThis work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health, grant number PI19/00561, from the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Madrid, Spain.
dc.identifier.citationJ Clin Med. 2025 Feb 26;14(5):1583.
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
dc.identifier.pubmedID40095519
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/26817
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051583
dc.repisalud.institucionCNIC
dc.repisalud.orgCNICCNIC::Grupos de investigación::Investigación Cardiovascular Traslacional Multidisciplinaria
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectcardiovascular
dc.subjectcoronary heart disease
dc.subjectgender
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjecttreatments
dc.subjectwomen
dc.titleGender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.
dc.typereview article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublication30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gender Differences in Clinical Practice_J Clin Med_2025.pdf
Size:
1.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format