Publication:
Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries

dc.contributor.authorRicci-Cabello, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorVasquez-Mejia, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorCanelo-Aybar, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorNino de Guzman, Ena
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Bracchiglione, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRabassa, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorRigau, David
dc.contributor.authorSola, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yang
dc.contributor.authorNeamtiu, Luciana
dc.contributor.authorParmelli, Elena
dc.contributor.authorSaz-Parkinson, ZuleiKa
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T09:11:44Z
dc.date.available2024-09-13T09:11:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-07
dc.description.abstractBackground: Breast cancer (BC) clinical guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations to improve quality of healthcare for patients with or at risk of BC. Suboptimal adherence to recommendations has the potential to negatively affect population health. However, no study has systematically reviewed the impact of BC guideline adherence -as prognosis factor- on BC healthcare processes and health outcomes. The objectives are to analyse the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes and on healthcare costs.MethodsWe searched systematic reviews and primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase, conducted in European Union (EU) countries (inception to May 2019). Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and crosschecked by a second. We used random-effects meta-analyses to examine the impact of guideline adherence on overall survival and disease-free survival, and assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE. Results: We included 21 primary studies. Most were published during the last decade (90%), followed a retrospective cohort design (86%), focused on treatment guideline adherence (95%), and were at low (80%) or moderate (20%) risk of bias. Nineteen studies (95%) examined the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes, while two (10%) on healthcare cost. Adherence to guidelines was associated with increased overall survival (HR=0.67, 95%CI 0.59-0.76) and disease-free survival (HR=0.35, 95%CI 0.15-0.82), representing 138 more survivors (96 more to 178 more) and 336 patients free of recurrence (73 more to 491 more) for every 1000 women receiving adherent CG treatment compared to those receiving non-adherent treatment at 5years follow-up (moderate certainty). Adherence to treatment guidelines was associated with higher costs, but adherence to follow-up guidelines was associated with lower costs (low certainty).Conclusions: Our review of EU studies suggests that there is moderate certainty that adherence to BC guidelines is associated with an improved survival. BC guidelines should be rigorously implemented in the clinical setting. Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42018092884).en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe systematic review was carried out by the Iberoamerican Cochrane Center under Framework contract 443094 for procurement of services between European Commission Joint Research Centre and Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana.; AVM received a training grant D43 TW007393 Fogarty International Centre of the US National Institutes of Health for the Emerging Diseases and Climate Change Research Unit of the School and Public Health Administration at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.es_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page920es_ES
dc.format.volume20es_ES
dc.identifier.citationRicci-Cabello I, Vasquez-Mejia A, Canelo-Aybar C, Nino De Guzman E, Perez-Bracchiglione J, Rabassa M, et al. Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 07;20(1):920.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-020-05753-x
dc.identifier.e-issn1472-6963es_ES
dc.identifier.journalBMC Health Services Researches_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/9087
dc.identifier.pubmedID33028324es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL633136800
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092475133
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/22864
dc.identifier.wos578522000003
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05753-xen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectClinical guidelines
dc.subjectAdherence
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subject.decsGuías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsAnálisis de Supervivencia*
dc.subject.decsUnión Europea*
dc.subject.decsFemenino*
dc.subject.decsNeoplasias de la Mama*
dc.subject.decsEstudios Observacionales como Asunto*
dc.subject.decsAdhesión a Directriz*
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasms*
dc.subject.meshEuropean Union*
dc.subject.meshFemale*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysis*
dc.subject.meshObservational Studies as Topic*
dc.subject.meshGuideline Adherence*
dc.subject.meshPractice Guidelines as Topic*
dc.titleAdherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countriesen
dc.typereview articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication99dfe2a8-30ac-4e03-acf8-eb088ad2485f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery99dfe2a8-30ac-4e03-acf8-eb088ad2485f
relation.isPublisherOfPublication4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3

Files