Publication:
Effectiveness of online interventions in preventing depression: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

dc.contributor.authorRigabert, Alina
dc.contributor.authorMotrico, Emma
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Peral, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorResurrección, Davinia M
dc.contributor.authorConejo-Cerón, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorNavas-Campaña, Desirée
dc.contributor.authorBellón, Juan Á
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T14:42:04Z
dc.date.available2024-02-08T14:42:04Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-28
dc.description.abstractAlthough evidence exists for the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in preventing depression, little is known about its prevention through online interventions. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of online interventions in preventing depression in heterogeneous populations. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that will be identified through searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, WOS, Scopus, OpenGrey, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Register . We will also search the reference lists provided in relevant studies and reviews. Experts in the field will be contacted to obtain more references. Two independent reviewers will assess the eligibility criteria of all articles, extract data and determine their risk of bias (Cochrane Collaboration Tool). Baseline depression will be required to have been discarded through standardised interviews or validated self-reports with standard cut-off points. The outcomes will be the incidence of new cases of depression and/or the reduction of depressive symptoms as measured by validated instruments. Pooled standardised mean differences will be calculated using random-effect models. Heterogeneity and publication bias will be estimated. Predefined sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be performed. If heterogeneity is relevant, random-effect meta-regression will be performed. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and will be presented at a professional conference. Ethical assessment is not required as we will search and assess existing sources of literature. CRD42014014804; Results.
dc.format.number11es_ES
dc.format.pagee022012es_ES
dc.format.volume8es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022012
dc.identifier.e-issn2044-6055es_ES
dc.identifier.journalBMJ openes_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/13263
dc.identifier.pubmedID30498036es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/17643
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subjectOnline
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subject.meshCognitive Behavioral Therapy
dc.subject.meshDepression
dc.subject.meshDepressive Disorder
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshInternet
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshPatient Education as Topic
dc.subject.meshPsychotherapy
dc.subject.meshResearch Design
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleEffectiveness of online interventions in preventing depression: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files