Publication:
Artificial Intelligence in Differential Diagnostics of Meningitis: A Nationwide Study

dc.contributor.authorMentis, Alexios-Fotios A
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Irene
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, Juan
dc.contributor.authorPaparoupa, Maria
dc.contributor.authorXirogianni, Athanasia
dc.contributor.authorPapandreou, Anastasia
dc.contributor.authorTzanakaki, Georgina
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T06:43:34Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T06:43:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.description.abstractDifferential diagnosis between bacterial and viral meningitis is crucial. In our study, to differentiate bacterial vs. viral meningitis, three machine learning (ML) algorithms (multiple logistic regression (MLR), random forest (RF), and naive-Bayes (NB)) were applied for the two age groups (0-14 and >14 years) of patients with meningitis by both conventional (culture) and molecular (PCR) methods. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neutrophils, CSF lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), blood albumin, blood C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose, blood soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), and CSF lymphocytes-to-blood CRP ratio (LCR) were used as predictors for the ML algorithms. The performance of the ML algorithms was evaluated through a cross-validation procedure, and optimal predictions of the type of meningitis were above 95% for viral and 78% for bacterial meningitis. Overall, MLR and RF yielded the best performance when using CSF neutrophils, CSF lymphocytes, NLR, albumin, glucose, gender, and CRP. Also, our results reconfirm the high diagnostic accuracy of NLR in the differential diagnosis between bacterial and viral meningitis.en
dc.description.sponsorshipIrene Garcia has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Sciences, Innovation and Universities and the European Regional Development Fund through project PGC2018-096956-BC43.es_ES
dc.format.number4es_ES
dc.format.page602es_ES
dc.format.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.citationMentis AFA, Garcia I, Jimenez J, Paparoupa M, Xirogianni A, Papandreou A, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Differential Diagnostics of Meningitis: A Nationwide Study. Diagnostics. 2021 Apr;11(4):602.en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics11040602
dc.identifier.e-issn2075-4418es_ES
dc.identifier.journalDiagnosticses_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/19446
dc.identifier.pubmedID33800653es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL2007655223
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109021139
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/23243
dc.identifier.wos642969200001
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040602en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectMeningitis
dc.subjectBacterial infection
dc.subjectViral infection
dc.subjectNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.titleArtificial Intelligence in Differential Diagnostics of Meningitis: A Nationwide Studyen
dc.typeresearch articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublication30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9

Files