Publication: Flow Cytometry Data Preparation Guidelines for Improved Automated Phenotypic Analysis.
| dc.contributor.author | Jimenez-Carretero, Daniel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ligos, José M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martínez-López, María | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sancho, David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Montoya, María C | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-16T08:51:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-16T08:51:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Advances in flow cytometry (FCM) increasingly demand adoption of computational analysis tools to tackle the ever-growing data dimensionality. In this study, we tested different data input modes to evaluate how cytometry acquisition configuration and data compensation procedures affect the performance of unsupervised phenotyping tools. An analysis workflow was set up and tested for the detection of changes in reference bead subsets and in a rare subpopulation of murine lymph node CD103+ dendritic cells acquired by conventional or spectral cytometry. Raw spectral data or pseudospectral data acquired with the full set of available detectors by conventional cytometry consistently outperformed datasets acquired and compensated according to FCM standards. Our results thus challenge the paradigm of one-fluorochrome/one-parameter acquisition in FCM for unsupervised cluster-based analysis. Instead, we propose to configure instrument acquisition to use all available fluorescence detectors and to avoid integration and compensation procedures, thereby using raw spectral or pseudospectral data for improved automated phenotypic analysis. | es_ES |
| dc.description.peerreviewed | Sí | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | We thank Irene Palacios, Elena Prieto, Mariano Vito´n, and Raquel Nieto for excellent technical assistance and Dr. Salvador Iborra for helpful discussion of dendritic cell studies. Editorial assistance was provided by Simon Bartlett. | es_ES |
| dc.format.number | 10 | es_ES |
| dc.format.page | 3319-3331 | es_ES |
| dc.format.volume | 200 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.citation | J Immunol . 2018 May 15;200(10):3319-3331 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4049/jimmunol.1800446 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.e-issn | 1550-6606 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.journal | Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.pubmedID | 29735643 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/15162 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | American Association of Immunologists (AAI) | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | 10.4049/jimmunol.1800446 | es_ES |
| dc.repisalud.institucion | CNIC | es_ES |
| dc.repisalud.orgCNIC | CNIC::Grupos de investigación::Inmunobiología | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.rights.license | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject.mesh | Animals | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Antigens, CD | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Cluster Analysis | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Dendritic Cells | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Flow Cytometry | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Integrin alpha Chains | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Lymph Nodes | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Mice | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Mice, Inbred C57BL | es_ES |
| dc.subject.mesh | Phenotype | es_ES |
| dc.title | Flow Cytometry Data Preparation Guidelines for Improved Automated Phenotypic Analysis. | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 35c9d189-273f-49b9-b5f6-43788016b2ca | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 58aa2591-8084-4500-bfe4-8f2c54e398e9 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 35c9d189-273f-49b9-b5f6-43788016b2ca |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- J Immunol 2018 May 15 Flow Cytometry Data Preparation.pdf
- Size:
- 4.05 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Artículo


