Publication:
Flow Cytometry Data Preparation Guidelines for Improved Automated Phenotypic Analysis.

dc.contributor.authorJimenez-Carretero, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLigos, José M
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-López, María
dc.contributor.authorSancho, David
dc.contributor.authorMontoya, María C
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-16T08:51:45Z
dc.date.available2022-11-16T08:51:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractAdvances in flow cytometry (FCM) increasingly demand adoption of computational analysis tools to tackle the ever-growing data dimensionality. In this study, we tested different data input modes to evaluate how cytometry acquisition configuration and data compensation procedures affect the performance of unsupervised phenotyping tools. An analysis workflow was set up and tested for the detection of changes in reference bead subsets and in a rare subpopulation of murine lymph node CD103+ dendritic cells acquired by conventional or spectral cytometry. Raw spectral data or pseudospectral data acquired with the full set of available detectors by conventional cytometry consistently outperformed datasets acquired and compensated according to FCM standards. Our results thus challenge the paradigm of one-fluorochrome/one-parameter acquisition in FCM for unsupervised cluster-based analysis. Instead, we propose to configure instrument acquisition to use all available fluorescence detectors and to avoid integration and compensation procedures, thereby using raw spectral or pseudospectral data for improved automated phenotypic analysis.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Irene Palacios, Elena Prieto, Mariano Vito´n, and Raquel Nieto for excellent technical assistance and Dr. Salvador Iborra for helpful discussion of dendritic cell studies. Editorial assistance was provided by Simon Bartlett.es_ES
dc.format.number10es_ES
dc.format.page3319-3331es_ES
dc.format.volume200es_ES
dc.identifier.citationJ Immunol . 2018 May 15;200(10):3319-3331es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4049/jimmunol.1800446es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1550-6606es_ES
dc.identifier.journalJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)es_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID29735643es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/15162
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Immunologists (AAI)es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion10.4049/jimmunol.1800446es_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionCNICes_ES
dc.repisalud.orgCNICCNIC::Grupos de investigación::Inmunobiologíaes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshAnimalses_ES
dc.subject.meshAntigens, CDes_ES
dc.subject.meshCluster Analysises_ES
dc.subject.meshDendritic Cellses_ES
dc.subject.meshFlow Cytometryes_ES
dc.subject.meshIntegrin alpha Chainses_ES
dc.subject.meshLymph Nodeses_ES
dc.subject.meshMicees_ES
dc.subject.meshMice, Inbred C57BLes_ES
dc.subject.meshPhenotypees_ES
dc.titleFlow Cytometry Data Preparation Guidelines for Improved Automated Phenotypic Analysis.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication35c9d189-273f-49b9-b5f6-43788016b2ca
relation.isAuthorOfPublication58aa2591-8084-4500-bfe4-8f2c54e398e9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery35c9d189-273f-49b9-b5f6-43788016b2ca

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
J Immunol 2018 May 15 Flow Cytometry Data Preparation.pdf
Size:
4.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artículo