Publication:
Malaria determining risk factors at the household level in two rural villages of mainland Equatorial Guinea

dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorde Sousa, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorNdong-Mabale, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorBerzosa, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorArez, Ana Paula
dc.contributor.funderFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portugal)
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-19T12:34:59Z
dc.date.available2018-12-19T12:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-18
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: After the introduction of an artemisinin-based combination therapy, the reduction of prevalence of malaria infections has shown a remarkable progress during the last decade. However due to the lack of a consistent malaria control programme and socioeconomic inequalities, Plasmodium infection is still one of the major cause of disease in Equatorial Guinea, namely in the rural communities. This study explored the associated risk factors of malaria transmission at the microeconomic level (households) in two rural villages of mainland Equatorial Guinea. METHODS: This survey involved 232 individuals living in 69 households located in two rural villages, Ngonamanga and Miyobo, of coastal and interior of Equatorial Guinea, respectively. Malaria prevalence was measured by PCR and parasitaemia level by optical microscopy; household socioeconomic status (SES) was measured based on house characteristics using a 2-step cluster analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship of a diverse set of independent variables on being diagnosed with malaria and on showing high levels of parasitaemia. RESULTS: The prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection was 69%, with 80% of households having at least one parasitaemic member. The majority of houses have eaves (80%), walls of clay/wood (90%) and zinc roof (99%) and only 10% of them have basic sanitation facilities. The studied areas showed reduced rates of indoor residual spraying coverage (9%), and long-lasting insecticide-treated net ownership (35%), with none of these preventive tools showing any significant effects on malaria risk in these areas. Neither the risk of malaria infection (PCR positive result) or the development of high parasitaemia did show association with SES. CONCLUSIONS: This study has contributed to reinforce the importance of living conditions associated to a high risk of malaria infection and vulnerability to develop high parasitaemia. This study also contributes to future malaria control interventions to be implemented in mainland Equatorial Guinea or in other countries with similar environmental conditions.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Grants PEst-OE/SAU/LA0018/2011-Proj. Estratégico LA0018 2011/2012, PTDC/SAU-EPI/113326/2009, and GHTM-UID/Multi/04413/2013, from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia/Ministério da Educação e Ciência (FCT), Portugal, and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Madrid, Spaines_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page203es_ES
dc.format.volume17es_ES
dc.identifier.citationMalar J. 2018 May 18;17(1):203es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12936-018-2354-xes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1475-2875es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1475-2875es_ES
dc.identifier.journalMalaria journales_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID29776367es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/6912
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2354-xes_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Medicina Tropical (CNMT)es_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectEquatorial Guineaes_ES
dc.subjectMalaria infectiones_ES
dc.subjectPlasmodium spp.es_ES
dc.subjectRisk factorses_ES
dc.subjectSocioeconomic statuses_ES
dc.subject.meshCluster Analysises_ES
dc.subject.meshEquatorial Guineaes_ES
dc.subject.meshFamily Characteristicses_ES
dc.subject.meshLogistic Modelses_ES
dc.subject.meshMalariaes_ES
dc.subject.meshMicroscopyes_ES
dc.subject.meshParasitemiaes_ES
dc.subject.meshPolymerase Chain Reactiones_ES
dc.subject.meshPrevalencees_ES
dc.subject.meshRisk Factorses_ES
dc.subject.meshRural Populationes_ES
dc.subject.meshSocioeconomic Factorses_ES
dc.titleMalaria determining risk factors at the household level in two rural villages of mainland Equatorial Guineaes_ES
dc.typeresearch articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd1a82f32-e7e2-471c-a59d-5cd408ac7228
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd1a82f32-e7e2-471c-a59d-5cd408ac7228
relation.isFunderOfPublication25f151af-8d71-4e41-b920-ca8474d267b7
relation.isFunderOfPublication7d739953-4b68-4675-b5bb-387a9ab74b66
relation.isFunderOfPublication.latestForDiscovery25f151af-8d71-4e41-b920-ca8474d267b7
relation.isPublisherOfPublication4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MalariaDeterminingRiskFactors_2018.pdf
Size:
950.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: