Publication:
Use and Misuse of Cq in qPCR Data Analysis and Reporting

dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Villalba, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorRuijter, Jan M.
dc.contributor.authorvan den Hoff, Maurice J. B.
dc.contributor.authoraffiliation[Ruiz-Villalba,A] Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Instituto Malagueño de Biomedicina (IBIMA), University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain. [Ruiz-Villalba,A] BIONAND, Centro Andaluz de Nanomedicina y Biotecnología, Junta de Andalucía, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain. [Ruijter,JM; van den Hoff, M.J.B] Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T15:28:30Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T15:28:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-29
dc.description.abstractIn the analysis of quantitative PCR (qPCR) data, the quantification cycle (Cq) indicates the position of the amplification curve with respect to the cycle axis. Because Cq is directly related to the starting concentration of the target, and the difference in Cq values is related to the starting concentration ratio, the only results of qPCR analysis reported are often Cq, ΔCq or ΔΔCq values. However, reporting of Cq values ignores the fact that Cq values may differ between runs and machines, and, therefore, cannot be compared between laboratories. Moreover, Cq values are highly dependent on the PCR efficiency, which differs between assays and may differ between samples. Interpreting reported Cq values, assuming a 100% efficient PCR, may lead to assumed gene expression ratios that are 100-fold off. This review describes how differences in quantification threshold setting, PCR efficiency, starting material, PCR artefacts, pipetting errors and sampling variation are at the origin of differences and variability in Cq values and discusses the limits to the interpretation of observed Cq values. These issues can be avoided by calculating efficiency-corrected starting concentrations per reaction. The reporting of gene expression ratios and fold difference between treatments can then easily be based on these starting concentrations.
dc.description.sponsorshipA.R.V. is supported by funds from University of Málaga (Incorporación de doctores from the I Plan Propio de Incorporación de Doctores, 2020).
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/life11060496
dc.identifier.e-issn2075-1729es_ES
dc.identifier.journalLifees_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/10668/3514
dc.identifier.pubmedID34072308es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18358
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/6/496es
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectqPCR analysis
dc.subjectCq
dc.subjectQuantification cycle
dc.subjectQuantification threshold
dc.subjectPCR efficiency
dc.subjectPoisson variation
dc.subjectLOD
dc.subjectLOQ
dc.subjectArtefactos
dc.subjectLaboratorios
dc.subjectExpresión génica
dc.subjectReacción en cadena en tiempo real de la polimerasa
dc.subject.meshArtifacts
dc.subject.meshLaboratories
dc.subject.meshGene Expression
dc.subject.meshReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
dc.titleUse and Misuse of Cq in qPCR Data Analysis and Reporting
dc.typereview article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublication30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery30293a55-0e53-431f-ae8c-14ab01127be9

Files