Publication:
A comparative examination of tuberculosis immigration medical screening programs from selected countries with high immigration and low tuberculosis incidence rates

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Gonzalo G
dc.contributor.authorGushulak, Brian
dc.contributor.authorAbu Rumman, Khaled
dc.contributor.authorAltpeter, Ekkehardt
dc.contributor.authorChemtob, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Paul
dc.contributor.authorErkens, Connie
dc.contributor.authorHelbling, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorJones, Jane
dc.contributor.authorMatteelli, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorPaty, Marie-Claire
dc.contributor.authorPosey, Drew L
dc.contributor.authorSagebiel, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSlump, Erika
dc.contributor.authorTegnell, Anders
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez Valin, Elena
dc.contributor.authorWinje, Brita Askeland
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Edward
dc.contributor.funderCitizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC)
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-01T18:01:41Z
dc.date.available2019-02-01T18:01:41Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-04
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) in migrants is an ongoing challenge in several low TB incidence countries since a large proportion of TB in these countries occurs in migrants from high incidence countries. To meet these challenges, several countries utilize TB screening programs. The programs attempt to identify and treat those with active and/or infectious stages of the disease. In addition, screening is used to identify and manage those with latent or inactive disease after arrival. Between nations, considerable variation exists in the methods used in migration-associated TB screening. The present study aimed to compare the TB immigration medical examination requirements in selected countries of high immigration and low TB incidence rates. METHODS: Descriptive study of immigration TB screening programs. RESULTS: 16 out of 18 eligible countries responded to the written standardized survey and phone interview. Comparisons in specific areas of TB immigration screening programs included authorities responsible for TB screening, the primary objectives of the TB screening program, the yield of detection of active TB disease, screening details and aspects of follow up for inactive pulmonary TB. No two countries had the same approach to TB screening among migrants. Important differences, common practices, common problems, evidence or lack of evidence for program specifics were noted. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of common goals, there is great diversity in the processes and practices designed to mitigate the impact of migration-associated TB among nations that screen migrants for the disease. The long-term goal in decreasing migration-related introduction of TB from high to low incidence countries remains diminishing the prevalence of the disease in those high incidence locations. In the meantime, existing or planned migration screening programs for TB can be made more efficient and evidenced based. Cooperation among countries doing research in the areas outlined in this study should facilitate the development of improved screening programs.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was funded by Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. The corresponding author has obtained approval from CIC to publish this paper. This paper represents the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada or the Government of Canada. This paper does not represent the views of any of the Governments or Ministries affiliated with the authors of this study and represents solely the views of the authors. Dr. S. Miyano contributed to the acquisition of the data and as such we feel he is entitled to authorship but, despite our extensive efforts, we were unable to contact him to approve the final content of this manuscript and his authorship. Therefore, we acknowledge his contribution here.es_ES
dc.format.number1es_ES
dc.format.page3es_ES
dc.format.volume11es_ES
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 4;11:3.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2334-11-3es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1471-2334es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334es_ES
dc.identifier.journalBMC infectious diseaseses_ES
dc.identifier.pubmedID21205318es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/7072
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-3es_ES
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Centro Nacional de Epidemiologíaes_ES
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIIIes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subject.meshAmericases_ES
dc.subject.meshAsiaes_ES
dc.subject.meshEuropees_ES
dc.subject.meshHumanses_ES
dc.subject.meshIncidencees_ES
dc.subject.meshMass Screeninges_ES
dc.subject.meshTuberculosis, Pulmonaryes_ES
dc.titleA comparative examination of tuberculosis immigration medical screening programs from selected countries with high immigration and low tuberculosis incidence rateses_ES
dc.typeresearch articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6abfadcb-a63d-4342-b77c-e8046e807317
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6abfadcb-a63d-4342-b77c-e8046e807317
relation.isPublisherOfPublication4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A ComparativeExaminationOf_2011.pdf
Size:
270.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: