Publication:
How to present economic evaluations to non-technical audiences? Randomized trials with professionals and the general population

dc.contributor.authorLinertová, Renata
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Yumar, Aránzazu
dc.contributor.authorGuirado-Fuentes, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Díaz, Benjamín
dc.contributor.authorValcárcel-Nazco, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorImaz-Iglesia, Iñaki
dc.contributor.authorCarmona, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pérez, Lidia
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.contributor.funderUnión Europea. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER/ERDF)
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T10:32:41Z
dc.date.available2025-02-03T10:32:41Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-25
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cost-effectiveness analyses of health technologies have become a part of the decision-making process in healthcare policies. Nevertheless, economic results are not always presented in comprehensible formats for non-technical audiences, such as the general population, healthcare professionals or decision-makers. The purpose of this study was to observe which formats best convey the key message of an economic evaluation, and which are best received by two different audiences. Methods: The summary of a hypothetical cost-effectiveness analysis was edited in different formats: infographic, plain language text and video-abstract for the general population; executive summary and policy brief for a specialized population, i.e. clinicians, clinical and non-clinical managers, or methodologists in health-technology assessment. Participants were randomly shown one of the formats, and data on objective and subjective comprehension, and perceived usefulness/acceptability were gathered by means of online questionnaires. Statistical differences between formats within each audience were analysed. Results: In the general population (N = 324), objective comprehension was statistically significantly better for infographic than for video-abstract (p = 0.005), and for plain text than for video-abstract (p = 0.024). There were no differences in subjective comprehension, but video-abstract was considered statistically significantly more useful to understand the information than plain text (p = 0.011). In the specialized population (N = 100), no statistically significant differences were observed for objective and subjective comprehension, although policy brief was perceived as statistically significantly more useful than executive summary (p = 0.005). Conclusions: A balance between effectivity of conveying the message and attractivity of the format needs to be sought, to facilitate non-technical audiences' understanding of economic data and, consequently, perceive decision-making processes as more transparent and legitimate. The infographic and policy brief could be robust ways to present economic data to the general public and specialized audience, respectively.
dc.description.peerreviewed
dc.description.sponsorshipThe FORM-EE Project (PI20/00815) was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Spain, and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER).
dc.format.number1
dc.format.page223
dc.format.volume82
dc.identifier.citationLinertová R, Hernández-Yumar A, Guirado-Fuentes C, Rodríguez-Díaz B, Valcárcel-Nazco C, Imaz-Iglesia I, Carmona-Rodríguez M, García-Pérez L. How to present economic evaluations to non-technical audiences? Randomized trials with professionals and the general population. Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 25;82(1):223.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13690-024-01453-8
dc.identifier.e-issn2049-3258
dc.identifier.issn0778-7367
dc.identifier.journalArchives of public health = Archives belges de santé publique
dc.identifier.pubmedID39587699
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/26238
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ISCIII/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020 (ISCIII)/PI20%2F00815/ES/IMPACTO DEL FORMATO SOBRE LA COMPRENSION DE DATOS ECONOMICOS EN EVALUACION DE TECNOLOGIAS SANITARIAS. ENSAYO ALEATORIO CONTROLADO/
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01453-8
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS)
dc.repisalud.centroISCIII::Escuela Nacional de Sanidad (ENS)
dc.repisalud.institucionISCIII
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAcceptability
dc.subjectComprehension
dc.subjectEconomic evaluation
dc.subjectExecutive summary
dc.subjectFormat
dc.subjectInfographic
dc.subjectPlain language summary
dc.subjectPolicy brief
dc.subjectUsefulness
dc.subjectVideo-abstract
dc.titleHow to present economic evaluations to non-technical audiences? Randomized trials with professionals and the general population
dc.typeresearch article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb21a9249-53ef-4cd6-b700-56908ef9fa77
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7704ab5a-2baf-4d0f-b098-0f4de8f8d95a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb21a9249-53ef-4cd6-b700-56908ef9fa77
relation.isFunderOfPublication7d739953-4b68-4675-b5bb-387a9ab74b66
relation.isFunderOfPublicationefa64f05-b985-4984-8f1e-5fc4ef21f502
relation.isFunderOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7d739953-4b68-4675-b5bb-387a9ab74b66
relation.isPublisherOfPublication4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HowPresentEconomicEvaluations_2024pdf.pdf
Size:
3.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Supplementary_HowPresentEconomicEvaluations_2024pdf.pdf
Size:
241.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format