Publication: How to present economic evaluations to non-technical audiences? Randomized trials with professionals and the general population
| dc.contributor.author | Linertová, Renata | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hernández-Yumar, Aránzazu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guirado-Fuentes, Carmen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez-Díaz, Benjamín | |
| dc.contributor.author | Valcárcel-Nazco, Cristina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Imaz-Iglesia, Iñaki | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carmona, Montserrat | |
| dc.contributor.author | García-Pérez, Lidia | |
| dc.contributor.funder | Instituto de Salud Carlos III | |
| dc.contributor.funder | Unión Europea. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER/ERDF) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-03T10:32:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-03T10:32:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-11-25 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Cost-effectiveness analyses of health technologies have become a part of the decision-making process in healthcare policies. Nevertheless, economic results are not always presented in comprehensible formats for non-technical audiences, such as the general population, healthcare professionals or decision-makers. The purpose of this study was to observe which formats best convey the key message of an economic evaluation, and which are best received by two different audiences. Methods: The summary of a hypothetical cost-effectiveness analysis was edited in different formats: infographic, plain language text and video-abstract for the general population; executive summary and policy brief for a specialized population, i.e. clinicians, clinical and non-clinical managers, or methodologists in health-technology assessment. Participants were randomly shown one of the formats, and data on objective and subjective comprehension, and perceived usefulness/acceptability were gathered by means of online questionnaires. Statistical differences between formats within each audience were analysed. Results: In the general population (N = 324), objective comprehension was statistically significantly better for infographic than for video-abstract (p = 0.005), and for plain text than for video-abstract (p = 0.024). There were no differences in subjective comprehension, but video-abstract was considered statistically significantly more useful to understand the information than plain text (p = 0.011). In the specialized population (N = 100), no statistically significant differences were observed for objective and subjective comprehension, although policy brief was perceived as statistically significantly more useful than executive summary (p = 0.005). Conclusions: A balance between effectivity of conveying the message and attractivity of the format needs to be sought, to facilitate non-technical audiences' understanding of economic data and, consequently, perceive decision-making processes as more transparent and legitimate. The infographic and policy brief could be robust ways to present economic data to the general public and specialized audience, respectively. | |
| dc.description.peerreviewed | Sí | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The FORM-EE Project (PI20/00815) was funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Spain, and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF/FEDER). | |
| dc.format.number | 1 | |
| dc.format.page | 223 | |
| dc.format.volume | 82 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Linertová R, Hernández-Yumar A, Guirado-Fuentes C, Rodríguez-Díaz B, Valcárcel-Nazco C, Imaz-Iglesia I, Carmona-Rodríguez M, García-Pérez L. How to present economic evaluations to non-technical audiences? Randomized trials with professionals and the general population. Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 25;82(1):223. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s13690-024-01453-8 | |
| dc.identifier.e-issn | 2049-3258 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0778-7367 | |
| dc.identifier.journal | Archives of public health = Archives belges de santé publique | |
| dc.identifier.pubmedID | 39587699 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/26238 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central (BMC) | |
| dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ISCIII/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020 (ISCIII)/PI20%2F00815/ES/IMPACTO DEL FORMATO SOBRE LA COMPRENSION DE DATOS ECONOMICOS EN EVALUACION DE TECNOLOGIAS SANITARIAS. ENSAYO ALEATORIO CONTROLADO/ | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01453-8 | |
| dc.repisalud.centro | ISCIII::Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS) | |
| dc.repisalud.centro | ISCIII::Escuela Nacional de Sanidad (ENS) | |
| dc.repisalud.institucion | ISCIII | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
| dc.rights.license | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Acceptability | |
| dc.subject | Comprehension | |
| dc.subject | Economic evaluation | |
| dc.subject | Executive summary | |
| dc.subject | Format | |
| dc.subject | Infographic | |
| dc.subject | Plain language summary | |
| dc.subject | Policy brief | |
| dc.subject | Usefulness | |
| dc.subject | Video-abstract | |
| dc.title | How to present economic evaluations to non-technical audiences? Randomized trials with professionals and the general population | |
| dc.type | research article | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | b21a9249-53ef-4cd6-b700-56908ef9fa77 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 7704ab5a-2baf-4d0f-b098-0f4de8f8d95a | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | b21a9249-53ef-4cd6-b700-56908ef9fa77 | |
| relation.isFunderOfPublication | 7d739953-4b68-4675-b5bb-387a9ab74b66 | |
| relation.isFunderOfPublication | efa64f05-b985-4984-8f1e-5fc4ef21f502 | |
| relation.isFunderOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 7d739953-4b68-4675-b5bb-387a9ab74b66 | |
| relation.isPublisherOfPublication | 4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3 | |
| relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3 |


