Publication:
Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries

dc.contributor.authorAbe, Toshikazu
dc.contributor.authorMadotto, Fabiana
dc.contributor.authorPham, Tai
dc.contributor.authorNagata, Isao
dc.contributor.authorUchida, Masatoshi
dc.contributor.authorTamiya, Nanako
dc.contributor.authorKurahashi, Kiyoyasu
dc.contributor.authorBellani, Giacomo
dc.contributor.authorLaffey, John G
dc.contributor.authorLUNG-SAFE Investigators
dc.contributor.authorESICM Trials Grp
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-06T09:53:51Z
dc.date.available2024-09-06T09:53:51Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-17
dc.description.abstractBackground: To better understand the epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), we investigated the current usage of tracheostomy in patients with ARDS recruited into the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG-SAFE) study. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of LUNG-SAFE, an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients receiving invasive or noninvasive ventilation in 50 countries spanning 5 continents. The study was carried out over 4 weeks consecutively in the winter of 2014, and 459 ICUs participated. We evaluated the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients that received tracheostomy, in the cohort of patients that developed ARDS on day 1-2 of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and in a subsequent propensity-matched cohort. Results: Of the 2377 patients with ARDS that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 309 (13.0%) underwent tracheostomy during their ICU stay. Patients from high-income European countries (n = 198/1263) more frequently underwent tracheostomy compared to patients from non-European high-income countries (n = 63/649) or patients from middle-income countries (n = 48/465). Only 86/309 (27.8%) underwent tracheostomy on or before day 7, while the median timing of tracheostomy was 14 (Q1-Q3, 7-21) days after onset of ARDS. In the subsample matched by propensity score, ICU and hospital stay were longer in patients with tracheostomy. While patients with tracheostomy had the highest survival probability, there was no difference in 60-day or 90-day mortality in either the patient subgroup that survived for at least 5 days in ICU, or in the propensity-matched subsample. Conclusions: Most patients that receive tracheostomy do so after the first week of critical illness. Tracheostomy may prolong patient survival but does not reduce 60-day or 90-day mortality.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded and supported by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), Brussels, Belgium, by St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, and by the University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI JP 16 K15388, Japan.es_ES
dc.format.page195es_ES
dc.format.volume22es_ES
dc.identifier.citationAbe T, Madotto F, Pham T, Nagata I, Uchida M, Tamiya N, et al. Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries. Crit Care. 2018 Aug 17;22:195.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6
dc.identifier.e-issn1364-8535es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1466-609X
dc.identifier.journalCritical Carees_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/9171
dc.identifier.pubmedID30115127es_ES
dc.identifier.puiL623488502
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85052654667
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/22549
dc.identifier.wos441988900003
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBioMed Central (BMC)
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6en
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectTracheostomy
dc.subjectAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
dc.subjectICU
dc.subjectVentilation
dc.subjectPropensity-matched analysis
dc.subject.decsEstudios de Cohortes*
dc.subject.decsTraqueostomía*
dc.subject.decsEnfermedad Crítica*
dc.subject.decsFemenino*
dc.subject.decsUnidades de Cuidados Intensivos*
dc.subject.decsMasculino*
dc.subject.decsPuntaje de Propensión*
dc.subject.decsHumanos*
dc.subject.decsPersona de Mediana Edad*
dc.subject.decsEstudios Prospectivos*
dc.subject.decsAnciano*
dc.subject.decsÍndice de Severidad de la Enfermedad*
dc.subject.decsInternacionalidad*
dc.subject.decsRespiración Artificial*
dc.subject.meshAged*
dc.subject.meshHumans*
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged*
dc.subject.meshIntensive Care Units*
dc.subject.meshMale*
dc.subject.meshSeverity of Illness Index*
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies*
dc.subject.meshTracheostomy*
dc.subject.meshCritical Illness*
dc.subject.meshFemale*
dc.subject.meshRespiration, Artificial*
dc.subject.meshCohort Studies*
dc.subject.meshInternationality*
dc.subject.meshPropensity Score*
dc.titleEpidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countriesen
dc.typeresearch article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isPublisherOfPublication4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3
relation.isPublisherOfPublication.latestForDiscovery4fe896aa-347b-437b-a45b-95f4b60d9fd3

Files