2026-05-22T05:24:14Zhttps://repisalud.isciii.es/rest/oai/request

oai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/234372024-11-28T22:41:00Zcom_20.500.12105_15322com_20.500.12105_2051col_20.500.12105_16967

00925njm 22002777a 4500 dc Serrano-Ripoll, Maria Jesus author Fiol-deRoque, Maria Antonia author Valderas, José M author Zamanillo Campos, Rocío author Llobera Cànaves, Joan author de Labry Lima, Antonio Olry author Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe author Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio author 2022-09-24 Aim: The primary aim was to examine the feasibility of intervention delivery and of trial procedures. Secondary aims were to study the intervention uptake; its acceptability and perceived utility; and its potential to improve safety culture and avoidable hospital admissions. Methods: We conducted a 3-month, single-arm feasibility study in 10 primary care (PC) centres in Spain. Centres received information regarding patients' experiences of safety (through the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care [PREOS-PC] questionnaire), and were instructed to plan safety improvements based on that feedback. We used a bespoke online tool to recruit PC professionals, collect patient feedback, and deliver it to the centres, and to collect outcome data (patient safety culture [Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture, MOSPSC questionnaire]). We measured recruitment and follow-up rates and intervention uptake (based on the number of safety improvement plans registered). We conducted semistructured interviews with 9 professionals to explore the intervention acceptability and perceived utility. Results: Of 256 professionals invited, 120 (47%) agreed to participate, and 97 completed baseline and postintervention measures. Of 780 patients invited, 585 (75%) completed the PREOS-PC questionnaire. Five of 10 centres (50%) designed an improvement plan, providing 27 plans in total (range per centre, 1-14). The intervention was perceived as a novel strategy for improving safety, although the healthcare professionals identified several factors limiting its acceptability and utility: lack of feedback at the individual professional level; potentially unrepresentative sample of patients providing feedback; and number of educational materials deemed overwhelming. Discussion: It is feasible to deliver the proposed intervention so long as the identified limitations are addressed. Serrano-Ripoll MJ, Fiol-deRoque MA, Valderas JM, Zamanillo-Campos R, Llobera J, de Labry Lima AO, et al. Feasibility of the SINERGIAPS (Sinergias entre profesionales y pacientes para una Atención Primaria Segura) intervention for improving patient safety in primary care. Fam Pract. 2022 Sep 24;39(5):843-51. 10.1093/fampra/cmac015 1460-2229 Family practice https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/18742 35253839 L637441394 2-s2.0-85139375090 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/23437 767465300001 Feasibility of the SINERGIAPS ("Sinergias entre profesionales y pacientes para una Atención Primaria Segura") intervention for improving patient safety in primary care