2026-04-29T04:09:19Zhttps://repisalud.isciii.es/rest/oai/requestoai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/185162024-11-28T14:50:58Zcom_20.500.12105_15322com_20.500.12105_2051col_20.500.12105_16927
Repisalud
author
Guallar-Bouloc, Marina
author
Gómez-Bueno, Paloma
author
Gonzalez-Sanchez, Manuel
author
Molina-Torres, Guadalupe
author
Lomas-Vega, Rafael
author
Galán-Mercant, Alejandro
authoraffiliation
[Guallar-Bouloc,M; Lomas-Vega,R] Department of Physiotherapy, Health Science Faculty, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain. [Gómez-Bueno,P; Galán-Mercant,A] Move-It Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, Sciences University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain. [Gonzalez-Sanchez,M] Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain. [Gonzalez-Sanchez,M] Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain. [Molina-Torres,G] Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almería, Almería, Spain. [Galán-Mercant,A] Biomedical Research Unit, Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA), Puerta del Mar University Hospital, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
2024-02-19T15:32:19Z
2024-02-19T15:32:19Z
2021-12-06
http://hdl.handle.net/10668/4060
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/18516
34886580
10.3390/ijerph182312858
1660-4601
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Background: Pelvic floor dysfunctions affect a third of the adult female population, including a large number of clinical conditions, which can be evaluated through validated questionnaires that inform us of the status and perception of women both objectively and subjectively. The main objective of this study was to review and explain the topics of the validated questionnaires in Spanish on pelvic floor dysfunctions and to review their psychometric properties. Methods: A systematic review was carried out in the PUBMED and WOS databases. The keywords used were in PUBMED: ((((((((“Fecal Incontinence” [Mesh]) OR “Urinary Incontinence” [Mesh]) OR “Pelvic Organ Prolapse” [Mesh]) OR “Pelvic Floor Disorders” [Mesh]) OR “Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological” [Mesh]) OR “Pelvic Girdle Pain” [Mesh]) OR “sexual function” [Title/Abstract]) OR “Prolapse” [Title/Abstract]) AND “Surveys and Questionnaires” [Mesh] AND “Validation” [Title/Abstract] combined with the Boolean operators “AND”/“OR”. In contrast, in WOS, a segregated search was carried out with each of the terms of pelvic floor dysfunction together with “Validation” and “Surveys and Questionnaires”. All articles published up to 19 November 2021 were considered. Methodological quality was assessed with the COSMIN scale. Results: A total of 687 articles were identified, of which 13 were included. The evaluated questionnaires and the structural characteristics and psychometric properties of each of them were collected. Conclusion: The Spanish versions of the questionnaires show good basic structural and psychometric characteristics for the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions and that they resemble other versions of the same questionnaire published in other languages.
eng
Pelvic floor dysfunctions
Sexual dysfunction
Urinary incontinence
Prolapse
Validation
Questionnaire
Spanish
Diafragma pélvico
Disfunciones sexuales
Incontinencia urinaria
Prolapso
Encuestas y cuestionarios
España
Spanish Questionnaires for the Assessment of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Women: A Systematic Review of the Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties
review article