2026-04-29T04:09:29Zhttps://repisalud.isciii.es/rest/oai/request
oai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/179962024-11-28T15:04:38Zcom_20.500.12105_15322com_20.500.12105_2051col_20.500.12105_16927
Repisalud author Trinidad-Fernández, Manuel author Beckwée, David author Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio author González-Sánchez, Manuel author Moreno, Francisco-Angel author González-Jiménez, Javier author Joos, Erika author Vaes, Peter authoraffiliation [Trinidad-Fernández,M; Beckwée,D; Vaes,P] Rehabilitation Sciences Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. [Trinidad-Fernández,M; Cuesta-Vargas,A; González-Sánchez,M] Clinimetric Group F-14, Department of Physiotherapy, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain. [Beckwée,D] Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. [Cuesta-Vargas,A] School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health Science, Queensland University Technology, Brisbane, Australia. [Moreno,FA; González-Jiménez,J] Machine Perception and Intelligent Robotics Group (MAPIR), Dept. of System Engineering and Automation, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain. [Joos,E] Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Department, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 2024-02-12T19:45:16Z 2024-02-12T19:45:16Z 2020-01-27 http://hdl.handle.net/10668/4536 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/17996 32012763 10.3390/s20030689 1424-8220 Sensors Background: The RGB-D camera is an alternative to asses kinematics in order to obtain objective measurements of functional limitations. The aim of this study is to analyze the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the motion capture depth camera in sub-acute and chronic low back pain patients. Methods: Thirty subjects (18–65 years) with non-specific lumbar pain were screened 6 weeks following an episode. RGB-D camera measurements were compared with an inertial measurement unit. Functional tests included climbing stairs, bending, reaching sock, lie-to-sit, sit-to-stand, and timed up-and-go. Subjects performed the maximum number of repetitions during 30 s. Validity was analyzed using Spearman’s correlation, reliability of repetitions was calculated by the intraclass correlation coe_cient and the standard error of measurement, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the responsiveness. Results: The kinematic análisis obtained variable results according to the test. The time variable had good values in the validity and reliability of all tests (r = 0.93–1.00, (intraclass correlation coe_cient (ICC) = 0.62–0.93). Regarding kinematics, the best results were obtained in bending test, sock test, and sit-to-stand test (r = 0.53–0.80, ICC = 0.64–0.83, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.55–84). Conclusion: Functional tasks, such as bending, sit-to-stand, reaching, and putting on sock, assessed with the RGB-D camera, revealed aceptable validity, reliability, and responsiveness in the assessment of patients with low back pain (LBP). eng Depth camera Motion capture system Low back pain Functional test Validation Responsiveness Reliability Disability evaluation Movement Dolor de la región lumbar Evaluación de la discapacidad Movimiento Validation, Reliability, and Responsiveness Outcomes Of Kinematic Assessment With An RGB-D Camera To Analyze Movement In Subacute And Chronic Low Back Pain research article